Literature DB >> 23054419

Are obese women more likely to participate in a mobile mammography program?

Elvonna Atkins1, Suresh Madhavan, Traci LeMasters, Ami Vyas, Sara Jane Gainor, Scot Remick.   

Abstract

Mobile mammography services are typically offered as a means to increase access and adherence to mammography screenings. As mobile mammography becomes a viable strategy to increase screening, a 3 year study of such a state-wide program in WV found surprisingly high rates of obesity within the study population. Thus, the objectives were to: (1) describe the demographic characteristics and comorbidities of women who utilized the WV program, and (2) determine the association between body mass index (BMI) and personal health and screening history, preventive care and wellness behaviors, nutrition and exercise behaviors, and demographics. Data collected from 1,099 women, age 40 and above, were analyzed using descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and a multivariate regression model. The majority (60.4 %) were married, had an income <$25,000 (59.2 %), and had health insurance (53.5 %). Major comorbidities were hypertension (49 %) and high cholesterol (43.9 %). Based on BMI scores, 884 participants were either overweight (26.6 %), mildly obese (27.7 %), moderately obese (15.1 %), or severely obese (11.1 %). Bivariate analyses indicated that increasing BMI was significantly associated with factors such as having hypertension or diabetes, limited daily activities, perceived health, and not smoking or drinking. The regression model was significant (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.425) indicating that women who engaged in preventive care behaviors were less likely to be obese than those who did not. The WV mobile mammography program appeared to attract women who were disproportionately obese and had multiple comorbidities, thus providing a great opportunity for targeted interventions related to improving preventive care and screening behaviors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23054419      PMCID: PMC4887906          DOI: 10.1007/s10900-012-9619-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  42 in total

1.  Mobile mammography for underserved women: what does the evidence say?

Authors:  Nora Buzek
Journal:  Adv Nurse Pract       Date:  2010-05

2.  Mobile mammography: results of a national survey.

Authors:  N D DeBruhl; L W Bassett; N W Jessop; A M Mason
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Obesity and women's health: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Teresa Kulie; Andrew Slattengren; Jackie Redmer; Helen Counts; Anne Eglash; Sarina Schrager
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

4.  How important are psychosocial predictors of mammography receipt among older women when immediate access is provided via on-site service?

Authors:  Beth Glenn; Roshan Bastani; David Reuben
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr

Review 5.  Body mass index and colon cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nisa M Maruthur; Shari Bolen; Kimberly Gudzune; Frederick L Brancati; Jeanne M Clark
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Barriers to routine gynecological cancer screening for White and African-American obese women.

Authors:  N K Amy; A Aalborg; P Lyons; L Keranen
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.095

7.  Body mass index and use of mammography screening in the United States.

Authors:  Kangmin Zhu; Hongyu Wu; Ismail Jatoi; John Potter; Craig Shriver
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Obesity and breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Christina C Wee; Ellen P McCarthy; Roger B Davis; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Does perception equal reality? Weight misperception in relation to weight-related attitudes and behaviors among overweight and obese US adults.

Authors:  Dustin T Duncan; Kathleen Y Wolin; Melissa Scharoun-Lee; Eric L Ding; Erica T Warner; Gary G Bennett
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Nonadherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: what are the linkages to chronic disease risk?

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Robert J Uhler; H Irene Hall; Peter A Briss
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  4 in total

1.  "Don't know" and accuracy of breast cancer risk perceptions among Appalachian women attending a mobile mammography program: implications for educational interventions and patient empowerment.

Authors:  Traci LeMasters; Suresh Madhavan; Elvonna Atkins; Ami Vyas; Scot Remick; Linda Vona-Davis
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Mobile Mammography Services and Underserved Women.

Authors:  Usha Trivedi; Toma S Omofoye; Cindy Marquez; Callie R Sullivan; Diane M Benson; Gary J Whitman
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-05

3.  Long-term prognostic implications of risk factors associated with tumor size: a case study of women regularly attending screening.

Authors:  Fredrik Strand; Keith Humphreys; Johanna Holm; Mikael Eriksson; Sven Törnberg; Per Hall; Edward Azavedo; Kamila Czene
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 4.  The scope and impact of mobile health clinics in the United States: a literature review.

Authors:  Stephanie W Y Yu; Caterina Hill; Mariesa L Ricks; Jennifer Bennet; Nancy E Oriol
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2017-10-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.