Literature DB >> 3870927

The behavioral risk factor surveys: II. Design, methods, and estimates from combined state data.

E M Gentry1, W D Kalsbeek, G C Hogelin, J T Jones, K L Gaines, M R Forman, J S Marks, F L Trowbridge.   

Abstract

Behavioral risk factor (BRF) telephone surveys were conducted by 28 states and the District of Columbia from April 1981 through October 1983 to obtain baseline prevalence estimates for risk factors associated with the leading causes of death among adults. A supplemental survey was conducted to cover the remaining states (except Hawaii) in order to provide individual states with national-level data for comparison purposes. The complex sampling designs and variable sampling rates among state surveys required the computation of sample weights before estimates on a national level could be made. Estimates from the combined individual surveys are similar to those obtained from more expensive in-person interviews. The BRF national prevalence estimate of chronic heavier drinking is 8.7 percent, equivalent to the 1979 National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse (NIAAA) estimate of 9 percent. The BRF estimate of 31.5 percent for current smokers compares closely with the 32.6 percent estimated by the 1980 Health Interview Survey. Despite recognized technical limitations, this type of telephone survey can be a practical and affordable source of information both for initially gathering prevalence data and for monitoring trends in the prevalence of behavioral risk factors of public health concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3870927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  126 in total

1.  Uses of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, 1993-1997.

Authors:  L W Figgs; Y Bloom; K Dugbatey; C A Stanwyck; D E Nelson; R C Brownson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Proxy reliability: health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures for people with disability.

Authors:  E M Andresen; V J Vahle; D Lollar
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Factors affecting levels of physical activity in adults.

Authors:  Vern Seefeldt; Robert M Malina; Michael A Clark
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  A prospective investigation of the impact of smoking bans on tobacco cessation and relapse.

Authors:  D R Longo; J C Johnson; R L Kruse; R C Brownson; J E Hewett
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Subgroup-specific effects of questionnaire wording on population-based estimates of mammography prevalence.

Authors:  P Z Siegel; J R Qualters; P D Mowery; S Campostrini; C Leutzinger; D V McQueen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Health care coverage and use of preventive services among the near elderly in the United States.

Authors:  E Powell-Griner; J Bolen; S Bland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  A comparison of national estimates from the National Health Interview Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  David E Nelson; Eve Powell-Griner; Machell Town; Mary Grace Kovar
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Differential correlates of physical activity in urban and rural adults of various socioeconomic backgrounds in the United States.

Authors:  S E Parks; R A Housemann; R C Brownson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  The Behavioral Risk Factor Survey and the Stanford Five-City Project Survey: a comparison of cardiovascular risk behavior estimates.

Authors:  C Jackson; D E Jatulis; S P Fortmann
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Carotid artery distensibility: a reliability study.

Authors:  Elisa Cuadrado Godia; Rishi Madhok; John Pittman; Samuel Trocio; Romel Ramas; Digna Cabral; Ralph L Sacco; Tatjana Rundek
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.