Literature DB >> 3592032

Preventive care: do we practice what we preach?

N Lurie, W G Manning, C Peterson, G A Goldberg, C A Phelps, L Lillard.   

Abstract

We used insurance claims from enrollees in the Rand Health Insurance Experiment to determine the amount of selected components of preventive care received by a representative sample of the non-aged population in the United States and to determine whether insurance coverage was an important determinant of that amount. Only 45 percent of infants received timely immunization for DPT and polio; 93 per cent received some well child care by 18 months of age. In the three-year experimental period, only 4 per cent of adults had a tetanus shot, 66 per cent of women aged 17-44 and 57 per cent aged 45-65 received a Pap smear, and 2 per cent of women aged 45-65 had a mammogram. Cost sharing was associated with even less preventive care: 60 per cent of children on the free plan and 49 per cent on cost sharing plans received preventive care of any type. For adults, women on the free plan received more preventive care of several kinds, and those aged 45-65 received more Pap smears than those on cost-sharing plans. Even with free care, most enrollees did not receive adequate preventive care. Thus, free care alone, while significant, is not a sufficient incentive to providing recommended levels of preventive care. The average per person insurance charge for increasing the amount of preventive care to a level consistent with that recommended would be $22 for a complete set of immunizations by age 18 months, $9 for a Pap smear every three years, and $97 for a Pap test and mammogram every three years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3592032      PMCID: PMC1647200          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.77.7.801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  9 in total

1.  General medical care and the education of internists in university hospitals. An evaluation of the teaching hospital general medicine group practice program.

Authors:  J Kosecoff; A Fink; R H Brook; A R Davies; G Goldberg; L S Linn; V A Clark; P C Salisbury
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Adult cancer prevention in primary care: patterns of practice in Québec.

Authors:  R N Battista
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Public and private prevention.

Authors:  A Yankauer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The periodic health examination: comparison of recommendations and internists' performance.

Authors:  F J Romm; S W Fletcher; B S Hulka
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 0.954

5.  Improving physician compliance with preventive medicine guidelines.

Authors:  D I Cohen; B Littenberg; C Wetzel; D Neuhauser
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Preventive content of adult primary care: do generalists and subspecialists differ?

Authors:  A J Dietrich; H Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Adult cancer prevention in primary care: contrasts among primary care practice settings in Québec.

Authors:  R N Battista; W O Spitzer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Performance of cancer screening in a university general internal medicine practice: comparison with the 1980 American Cancer Society Guidelines.

Authors:  S J McPhee; R J Richard; S N Solkowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Screening procedures in the asymptomatic adult. Comparison of physicians' recommendations, patients' desires, published guidelines, and actual practice.

Authors:  B Woo; B Woo; E F Cook; M Weisberg; L Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-09-20       Impact factor: 56.272

  9 in total
  45 in total

1.  Variation in recommendations for cancer screening among primary care physicians in New Mexico.

Authors:  C J Herman; R M Hoffman; K K Altobelli
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1999-08

2.  Put prevention into practice: a controlled evaluation.

Authors:  J Melnikow; N D Kohatsu; B K Chan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Initiation and maintenance of patient behavioral change: what is the role of the physician?

Authors:  T E Kottke; L I Solberg; M L Brekke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Implementation of cancer prevention guidelines in clinical practice.

Authors:  S J McPhee; J A Bird
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Consumer-directed health care: will it improve health system performance?

Authors:  Karen Davis
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Diffusion of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations into practice.

Authors:  R S Lawrence
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Background and objectives of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  J M McGinnis; S H Woolf
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Implementing guidelines in general practice care.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-09

9.  Testing various methods of introducing health charts into medical records in family medicine units.

Authors:  R N Battista; J I Williams; J Boucher; E Rosenberg; S J Stachenko; J Adam; C Levinton; S Suissa
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Health Belief Model variables as predictors of screening mammography utilization.

Authors:  R B Hyman; S Baker; R Ephraim; A Moadel; J Philip
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.