Literature DB >> 22840291

Segmental increases in force application during colonoscope insertion: quantitative analysis using force monitoring technology.

Louis Y Korman1, Lawrence J Brandt, David C Metz, Nadim G Haddad, Stanley B Benjamin, Susan K Lazerow, Hannah L Miller, David A Greenwald, Sameer Desale, Milind Patel, Armen Sarvazyan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is a frequently performed procedure that requires extensive training and a high skill level.
OBJECTIVE: Quantification of forces applied to the external portion of the colonoscope insertion tube during the insertion phase of colonoscopy.
DESIGN: Observational cohort study of 7 expert and 9 trainee endoscopists for analysis of colonic segment force application in 49 patients. Forces were measured by using the colonoscopy force monitor, which is a wireless, handheld device that attaches to the insertion tube of the colonoscope.
SETTING: Academic gastroenterology training programs. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing routine screening or diagnostic colonoscopy with complete segment force recordings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Axial and radial force and examination time.
RESULTS: Both axial and radial force increased significantly as the colonoscope was advanced from the rectum to the cecum. Analysis of variance demonstrated highly significant operator-independent differences between segments of the colon (zones) in all axial and radial forces except average torque. Expert and trainee endoscopists differed only in the magnitude of counterclockwise force, average push/pull force rate used, and examination time. LIMITATIONS: Small study, observational design, effect of prototype device on insertion tube manipulation.
CONCLUSION: Axial and radial forces used to advance the colonoscope increase through the segments of the colon and are operator independent.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22840291      PMCID: PMC3530197          DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  27 in total

1.  Biomechanical and morphological properties in rat large intestine.

Authors:  C Gao; H Gregersen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  The measurement of forces exerted during colonoscopy.

Authors:  M N Appleyard; C A Mosse; T N Mills; G D Bell; F D Castillo; C P Swain
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program on colonoscopy practice.

Authors:  G Imperiali; G Minoli; G M Meucci; G Spinzi; E Strocchi; V Terruzzi; F Radaelli
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 5.  Quality assurance of training.

Authors:  Paul Dunckley; Grace Elta
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.043

6.  Convergence of sensory pathways in the development of somatic and visceral hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Klaus Bielefeldt; Kenneth Lamb; G F Gebhart
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 7.  Innovative health reform models: pay-for-performance initiatives.

Authors:  Seth W Glickman; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Characterization of forces applied by endoscopists during colonoscopy by using a wireless colonoscopy force monitor.

Authors:  Louis Y Korman; Vladimir Egorov; Sergey Tsuryupa; Brendan Corbin; Mary Anderson; Noune Sarvazyan; Armen Sarvazyan
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Technical performance of colonoscopy: the key role of sedation/analgesia and other quality indicators.

Authors:  Franco Radaelli; Gianmichele Meucci; Giusy Sgroi; Giorgio Minoli
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  A randomized, controlled comparison of warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation versus air insufflation for aiding colonoscopy insertion in sedated patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

Authors:  Joseph W Leung; Surinder K Mann; Rodelei Siao-Salera; Kanat Ransibrahmanakul; Brian Lim; Hazel Cabrera; Wilhemina Canete; Paul Barredo; Rebeck Gutierrez; Felix W Leung
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  1 in total

1.  Robotic control of a traditional flexible endoscope for therapy.

Authors:  J G Ruiter; G M Bonnema; M C van der Voort; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-04-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.