Literature DB >> 33090315

Hydro-jet propelled colonoscopy: proof of concept in a phantom colon.

Stuart A Coleman1, Markus Pakleppa2, Alfred Cuschieri3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is a widely used and effective procedure, but it often causes patient discomfort and its execution requires considerable skill and training. We demonstrate an alternative approach to colonoscope propulsion with the potential to minimise patient discomfort by reducing the forces exerted on the colonic wall and mesentery, and to reduce the level of skill required for execution.
METHODS: A prototype colonoscopic device is described, consisting of a tethered capsule that is propelled and manoeuvred through a water-filled colon (hydro-colonoscopy) by an array of water jets. As an initial proof of concept, experiments were performed to assess the ability of the device to navigate through a simplified PVA cryogel human colon phantom arranged in various anatomical configurations.
RESULTS: The prototype was capable of successfully navigating through three out of four colon configurations: a simple layout, alpha loop and reverse alpha loop. It was unable to negotiate the fourth configuration involving an "N loop", but this was attributed to problems with the colon phantom. In the successful test replicates, mean complete insertion (i.e. caecal intubation) time was 4.7 min. Measured pressures, temperatures and forces exerted on the colon appeared to be within a physiologically acceptable range. The results demonstrate the viability of propelling a colonoscope through a colon phantom using hydro-jets.
CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that this approach has the potential to enable rapid and safe caecal intubation. This suggests that further development towards clinical translation is worthwhile.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon; Colonoscope; Jet; Phantom; Propulsion; Water

Year:  2020        PMID: 33090315      PMCID: PMC7819862          DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08089-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  The measurement of forces exerted during colonoscopy.

Authors:  M N Appleyard; C A Mosse; T N Mills; G D Bell; F D Castillo; C P Swain
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Mechanical properties of the human gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Viacheslav I Egorov; Ilia V Schastlivtsev; Edward V Prut; Andrey O Baranov; Robert A Turusov
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Construct validation of a physical model colonoscopy simulator.

Authors:  Annaliese M Plooy; Andrew Hill; Mark S Horswill; Alanna St G Cresp; Marcus O Watson; Soong-Yuan Ooi; Stephan Riek; Guy M Wallis; Robin Burgess-Limerick; David G Hewett
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Learning curves for colonoscopy: a prospective evaluation of gastroenterology fellows at a single center.

Authors:  Jae Il Chung; Nayoung Kim; Min Sik Um; Kyung Phil Kang; Donghun Lee; Jong Chun Na; Eun Sil Lee; Yeon Mu Chung; Ji Yeon Won; Kwang Ho Lee; Tek Man Nam; Jung Hun Lee; Hyun Chul Choi; Sang Hyub Lee; Young Soo Park; Jin Hyuk Hwang; Jin-Wook Kim; Sook-Hyang Jeong; Dong Ho Lee
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.519

5.  A novel self-propelled disposable colonoscope is effective for colonoscopy in humans (with video).

Authors:  Nathan Gluck; Alaa Melhem; Zamir Halpern; Klaus Mergener; Erwin Santo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Air-pressure-induced colon injury during diagnostic colonoscopy.

Authors:  R A Kozarek; D L Earnest; M E Silverstein; R G Smith
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Endotics system vs colonoscopy for the detection of polyps.

Authors:  Emanuele Tumino; Rodolfo Sacco; Marco Bertini; Michele Bertoni; Giuseppe Parisi; Alfonso Capria
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Patient pain during colonoscopy: an analysis using real-time magnetic endoscope imaging.

Authors:  S G Shah; J C Brooker; C Thapar; C B Williams; B P Saunders
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Maurits J Wiersema; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  High cecal intubation rates with a new computer-assisted colonoscope: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Stefan Groth; Douglas K Rex; Thomas Rösch; Nicolas Hoepffner
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.