Literature DB >> 744673

A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus?

R Rosser, P Kind.   

Abstract

A difficult task in designing indices of health and measures of health output is deriving a scale of valuations of a set of defined states of health or illness. A scale derived by structured interview of 70 subjects and tested on a further 50 subjects is described. The method aims for a ratio scale and the extent to which this has actually been achieved is discussed. Scale values appear to be independent of the sex, age, socio-economic group, religious belief and past medical history of the subject, but have some association with current experience of illness. There is agreement between scale values obtained from medical nurses and patients and agreement between the different values obtained from psychiatric nurses and patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 744673     DOI: 10.1093/ije/7.4.347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  87 in total

1.  The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G Hawthorne; J Richardson; R Osborne
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Valuing health-related quality of life. A review of health state valuation techniques.

Authors:  C Green; J Brazier; M Deverill
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Is there such a thing as a life not worth living?

Authors:  B Farsides; R J Dunlop
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-16

Review 4.  A review of alternative approaches to healthcare resource allocation.

Authors:  S Petrou; J Wolstenholme
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Measuring handicap: motives, methods, and a model.

Authors:  R H Harwood; S Jitapunkul; E Dickinson; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

Review 6.  Common errors and controversies in pharmacoeconomic analyses.

Authors:  S Byford; S Palmer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease.

Authors:  R H Harwood; A Rogers; E Dickinson; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

8.  Implementation of evidence-based treatment for schizophrenic disorders: two-year outcome of an international field trial of optimal treatment.

Authors:  Ian R H Falloon; Isabel Montero; Mehmet Sungur; Antonino Mastroeni; Ulf Malm; Marina Economou; Rolf Grawe; Judit Harangozo; Masafumi Mizuno; Masaaki Murakami; Bert Hager; Tilo Held; Franco Veltro; Robyn Gedye
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 49.548

9.  Reprocessing data to form QALYs.

Authors:  J Coast
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-11

10.  A quality-of-life method for estimating the value of avoided morbidity.

Authors:  M T French; J A Mauskopf
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.