Literature DB >> 21076562

Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.

T Bedirhan Ustün1, Somnath Chatterji, Nenad Kostanjsek, Jürgen Rehm, Cille Kennedy, Joanne Epping-Jordan, Shekhar Saxena, Michael von Korff, Charles Pull.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for measuring functioning and disability in accordance with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. WHODAS 2.0 is a standard metric for ensuring scientific comparability across different populations.
METHODS: A series of studies was carried out globally. Over 65,000 respondents drawn from the general population and from specific patient populations were interviewed by trained interviewers who applied the WHODAS 2.0 (with 36 items in its full version and 12 items in a shortened version).
FINDINGS: The WHODAS 2.0 was found to have high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, α: 0.86), a stable factor structure; high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.98); good concurrent validity in patient classification when compared with other recognized disability measurement instruments; conformity to Rasch scaling properties across populations, and good responsiveness (i.e. sensitivity to change). Effect sizes ranged from 0.44 to 1.38 for different health interventions targeting various health conditions.
CONCLUSION: The WHODAS 2.0 meets the need for a robust instrument that can be easily administered to measure the impact of health conditions, monitor the effectiveness of interventions and estimate the burden of both mental and physical disorders across different populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21076562      PMCID: PMC2971503          DOI: 10.2471/BLT.09.067231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  23 in total

1.  Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease.

Authors:  R H Harwood; A Rogers; E Dickinson; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

2.  Levels of ability and functioning: using the WHODAS II in an Irish context.

Authors:  Pamela Gallagher; Fiona Mulvany
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Tacit models of disability underlying health status instruments.

Authors:  S Ziebland; R Fitzpatrick; C Jenkinson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  The assessment of patients with long-term psychotic disorders: application of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II.

Authors:  P K Chopra; J W Couper; H Herrman
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.744

5.  Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule used in the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders.

Authors:  M A Buist-Bouwman; J Ormel; R De Graaf; G Vilagut; J Alonso; E Van Sonderen; W A M Vollebergh
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.035

6.  Inter-rater reliability of the Disability Assessment Schedule (DAS, version II). An Italian study.

Authors:  M P Ardoin; C Faccincani; M Galati; I Gavioli; G Mignolli
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.328

7.  Quality of life in systemic sclerosis: psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II.

Authors:  Marie Hudson; Russell Steele; Suzanne Taillefer; Murray Baron
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-02-15

8.  World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II: contribution to the Italian validation.

Authors:  Stefano Federici; Fabio Meloni; Alessandra Mancini; Marco Lauriola; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  The schedule for assessment of psychiatric disability - a modification of the das-ii.

Authors:  R Thara; S Rajkumar; V Valecha
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 1.759

10.  Contribution of chronic diseases to disability in elderly people in countries with low and middle incomes: a 10/66 Dementia Research Group population-based survey.

Authors:  Renata M Sousa; Cleusa P Ferri; Daisy Acosta; Emiliano Albanese; Mariella Guerra; Yueqin Huang; K S Jacob; A T Jotheeswaran; Juan J Llibre Rodriguez; Guillermina Rodriguez Pichardo; Marina Calvo Rodriguez; Aquiles Salas; Ana Luisa Sosa; Joseph Williams; Tirso Zuniga; Martin Prince
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  409 in total

1.  Concordance between severity of disease, prevalence of nonmotor symptoms, patient-reported quality of life and disability and use of medication in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Alberto Raggi; Matilde Leonardi; Venusia Covelli; Alberto Albanese; Paola Soliveri; Francesco Carella; Luigi Romito
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Strength measures are better than muscle mass measures in predicting health-related outcomes in older people: time to abandon the term sarcopenia?

Authors:  J C Menant; F Weber; J Lo; D L Sturnieks; J C Close; P S Sachdev; H Brodaty; S R Lord
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Cancer-related fatigue and associated disability in post-treatment cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jennifer M Jones; Karin Olson; Pamela Catton; Charles N Catton; Neil E Fleshner; Monika K Krzyzanowska; David R McCready; Rebecca K S Wong; Haiyan Jiang; Doris Howell
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Understanding the need for assistance with survey completion in people with Huntington disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hahn; Nancy R Downing; Julie C Stout; Jane S Paulsen; Becky Ready; Siera Goodnight; Jin-Shei Lai; Jennifer A Miner; Noelle E Carlozzi
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Measuring social integration in a pilot randomized controlled trial of critical time: intervention-task shifting in Latin America.

Authors:  Joy Noel Baumgartner; Tatiana Fernandes Carpinteiro da Silva; Eliecer Valencia; Ezra Susser
Journal:  Cad Saude Colet       Date:  2012-01

6.  Use of Traditional Healing Practices in Two Ontario First Nations.

Authors:  Julie George; Melissa MacLeod; Kathryn Graham; Sara Plain; Sharon Bernards; Samantha Wells
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-04

7.  Reliability and validity of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin-Beck disease.

Authors:  Mohammad Imran Younus; Di-Miao Wang; Fang-Fang Yu; Hua Fang; Xiong Guo
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 8.  The development of an ICF-based clinical guideline and screening tool for the standardized assessment and evaluation of functioning after head and neck cancer treatment.

Authors:  Ulrich Kisser; Christine Adderson-Kisser; Michaela Coenen; Marita Stier-Jarmer; Sven Becker; Carla Sabariego; Ulrich Harréus
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  HDQLIFE: development and assessment of health-related quality of life in Huntington disease (HD).

Authors:  N E Carlozzi; S G Schilling; J-S Lai; J S Paulsen; E A Hahn; J S Perlmutter; C A Ross; N R Downing; A L Kratz; M K McCormack; M A Nance; K A Quaid; J C Stout; R C Gershon; R E Ready; J A Miner; S K Barton; S L Perlman; S M Rao; S Frank; I Shoulson; H Marin; M D Geschwind; P Dayalu; S M Goodnight; D Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Psychosocial Factors Influence Physical Activity after Dysvascular Amputation: A Convergent Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Matthew J Miller; Megan A Morris; Dawn M Magnusson; Kelly Putnam; Paul F Cook; Margaret L Schenkman; Cory L Christiansen
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.