Literature DB >> 10155673

Cost utility of chemotherapy and best supportive care in non-small cell lung cancer.

W Kennedy1, D Reinharz, G Tessier, A P Contandriopoulos, I Trabut, F Champagne, J Ayoub.   

Abstract

Polychemotherapy is the therapeutic option recommended for nonresectable, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the modest gains in survival, and the frequent and often serious adverse effects, associated with chemotherapy should also be considered when deciding on therapy. We therefore performed a cost-utility analysis of chemotherapy and best supportive care in NSCLC. Effectiveness and costs were analysed on 70 patients who were randomised to receive one of 3 treatments: VP (vindesine and cisplatin), CAP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and cisplatin), or best supportive care. Subsequently, an assessment of the value of polychemotherapy and best supportive care was performed by oncology personnel using the time trade-off technique. Polychemotherapy was found to be more effective than best supportive care, but was also more costly and had a lower value score. Because of its cost utility and its higher value, best supportive care should not be discarded as an alternative for the treatment of NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 10155673     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199508040-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  16 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 1992.

Authors:  C C Boring; T S Squires; T Tong
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Effects of framing and level of probability on patients' preferences for cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  A M O'Connor
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Polychemotherapy in advanced non small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  P J Souquet; F Chauvin; J P Boissel; R Cellerino; Y Cormier; P A Ganz; S Kaasa; J L Pater; E Quoix; E Rapp
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-07-03       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Controversies in the management of non-small cell lung cancer: the results of an expert surrogate study.

Authors:  M J Palmer; B O'Sullivan; R Steele; W J Mackillop
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Counting the costs of chemotherapy in a National Cancer Institute of Canada randomized trial in nonsmall-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  L Jaakkimainen; P J Goodwin; J Pater; P Warde; N Murray; E Rapp
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Eliciting preferences for alternative drug therapies in oncology: influence of treatment outcome description, elicitation technique and treatment experience on preferences.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; N F Boyd; P Warde; L Stolbach; J E Till
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

Review 7.  Combined-modality therapies for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C P Belani; J Aisner
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 8.  Management of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and a consideration of cost.

Authors:  W K Evans
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play?

Authors:  L F Degner; J A Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions.

Authors:  H J Sutherland; H A Llewellyn-Thomas; G A Lockwood; D L Tritchler; J E Till
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Benefit valuation in economic evaluation of cancer therapies. A systematic review of the published literature.

Authors:  J Brown; M Sculpher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  The use of QALY and non-QALY measures of health-related quality of life. Assessing the state of the art.

Authors:  M Deverill; J Brazier; C Green; A Booth
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  The generalisability of pharmacoeconomic studies.

Authors:  J Mason
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Validity and feasibility of the use of condition-specific outcome measures in economic evaluation.

Authors:  Elly A Stolk; Jan J V Busschbach
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Estimation of the additional costs of chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  L Maslove; N Gower; S Spiro; R Rudd; R Stephens; P West
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation (EGFR) Testing for Prediction of Response to EGFR-Targeting Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Drugs in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-12-01

Review 7.  Economics of treatments for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Christos Chouaid; Kukovi Atsou; Gilles Hejblum; Alain Vergnenegre
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Community- and Choice-Based Health State Utility Values for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Erik F Blom; Kevin Ten Haaf; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.981

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.