Literature DB >> 15994264

Estimation of the additional costs of chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

L Maslove1, N Gower, S Spiro, R Rudd, R Stephens, P West.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A large multicentre randomised trial, the Big Lung Trial, which in part compared supportive care with or without cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, provided an opportunity to evaluate the impact on the UK National Health Service of the costs incurred with the use of chemotherapy.
METHODS: This costing study was based on the retrospective collection of resource use data from hospital records. Case notes from 194 patients (98 chemotherapy + supportive care (C), 96 supportive care alone (NoC)) were inspected in eight centres recruiting the largest numbers of patients into the Big Lung Trial. Quantities were multiplied by fixed unit costs to calculate a total cost for each patient. The main outcome measure was the total cost incurred by the use of secondary care resources (including investigations, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgical procedures, inpatient days, outpatient attendances, and hospice inpatient care) in the two groups.
RESULTS: Patients randomised to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy had an average of 3.4 more inpatient bed days than the mean of 11.9 days for patients randomised to supportive care alone, and more outpatient attendances. NoC patients were more likely to have received palliative radiotherapy. The mean total cost for C patients was 5355 sterling pound compared with 3595 sterling pound for the NoC group, difference 760 sterling pound (95% CI 781 sterling pound to 2742 sterling pound ). When split, the cost in the C group associated with the administration of chemotherapy was 1233 sterling pound and non-chemotherapy costs were 4122 sterling pound .
CONCLUSION: The additional cost of chemotherapy was not offset by a reduction in subsequent costs (as the non-chemotherapy costs were similar), so the survival benefit of about 10 weeks observed in the C group was achieved with the cost of chemotherapy administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15994264      PMCID: PMC1747451          DOI: 10.1136/thx.2004.039479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  23 in total

1.  Economic analysis of the TAX 317 trial: docetaxel versus best supportive care as second-line therapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Natasha B Leighl; Frances A Shepherd; Rita Kwong; Ronald L Burkes; Ronald Feld; Pamela J Goodwin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Clinical and cost effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Clegg; D A Scott; P Hewitson; M Sidhu; N Waugh
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Economic evaluation in a randomized phase III clinical trial comparing gemcitabine/cisplatin and etoposide/cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J A Sacristán; T Kennedy-Martin; R Rosell; F Cardenal; A Antón; M Lomas; V Alberola; B Massuti; A Carrato; M Minshall
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.705

4.  [Cost-effectiveness of weekly paclitaxel for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer].

Authors:  Hisashi Suyama; Yutaka Hitsuda; Shingo Matsumoto; Masaki Nakamoto; Yasushi Shigeoka; Hirofumi Nakanishi; Tadashi Igishi; Naoto Burioka; Kazuhito Yasuda; Takanori Sako; Masanori Miyata; Masahiro Endo; Eiji Shimizu
Journal:  Gan To Kagaku Ryoho       Date:  2003-03

5.  Paclitaxel plus carboplatin, compared with paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, shows similar efficacy while more cost-effective: a randomized phase II study of combination chemotherapy against inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer previously untreated.

Authors:  Y M Chen; R P Perng; Y C Lee; J F Shih; C S Lee; C M Tsai; J Whang-Peng
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Economic analysis of vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; Carol M Moinpour; Laura C Lovato; John J Crowley; Patra Grevstad; Cary A Presant; Saul E Rivkin; Karen Kelly; David R Gandara
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-02-20       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Patterns, costs and cost-effectiveness of care in a trial of chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  L J Billingham; S Bathers; A Burton; S Bryan; M H Cullen
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.705

8.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jeremy Holmes; David Dunlop; Lindsay Hemmett; Peter Sharplin; Uday Bose
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Retrospective cost analysis of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer compared to other combination therapies in Europe.

Authors:  Joan Schiller; Dominic Tilden; Michael Aristides; Michael Lees; Adrian Kielhorn; Nikos Maniadakis; Shkun Bhalla
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.705

10.  Cost-effectivenes of paclitaxel plus cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C C Earle; W K Evans
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Economics of treatments for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Christos Chouaid; Kukovi Atsou; Gilles Hejblum; Alain Vergnenegre
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.