Literature DB >> 2166142

Counting the costs of chemotherapy in a National Cancer Institute of Canada randomized trial in nonsmall-cell lung cancer.

L Jaakkimainen1, P J Goodwin, J Pater, P Warde, N Murray, E Rapp.   

Abstract

An economic evaluation was undertaken of a previously reported National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) trial of chemotherapy in advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). That trial had demonstrated a survival benefit associated with the use of either vindesine and cisplatin (VP) or cyclosphosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CAP) in relation to best supportive care (BSC). The economic technique used in this evaluation was cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). All costs were determined from the viewpoint of two provincial health care plans. When compared with BSC, the survival benefit of 8 weeks in favor of patients receiving CAP chemotherapy was associated with an economic saving of $949.49 (in 1984 Canadian dollars). This translated into a savings of $6,171.69 per year of life gained. The mean survival benefit of 12.8 weeks that was obtained with VP chemotherapy compared with BSC was associated with an increased cost of $3,637.60 per patient, or $14,777.75 per year of life gained. The economic evaluation demonstrated that the majority of costs on each of the three treatment arms was related to hospitalization and not to the use of chemotherapy agents. These results compare favorably with estimates of cost-effectiveness (CE) of commonly used treatments for other diseases and demonstrate that a policy of supportive care is associated with costs that may exceed those of active treatment. It is concluded that economic factors should not adversely affect decisions regarding the use of chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2166142     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.8.1301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  36 in total

Review 1.  Second-line chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  F V Fossella
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C J Sweeney; A B Sandler
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Economic analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

Authors:  G H Lyman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Management of lung cancer.

Authors:  A Melville; A Eastwood
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-09

5.  Institutional formularies: the relevance of pharmacoeconomic analysis to formulary decisions.

Authors:  R J Lipsy
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Indices of therapeutic outcome in pharmacoeconomic evaluation of drug therapy.

Authors:  S F Hurley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Statistical analysis in pharmacoeconomic studies. A review of current issues and standards.

Authors:  D Coyle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Fair and effective resource allocation in cancer care: uncharted territory?

Authors:  J A Green; C Williams; A Cribb; B Brecher; M Evans
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1996-02

9.  Cancer treatment: deciding what we can afford.

Authors:  G J Rees
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-06

Review 10.  Clinical and cost effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Clegg; D A Scott; P Hewitson; M Sidhu; N Waugh
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.