Literature DB >> 9701969

The role of dynamic information in the recognition of unfamiliar faces.

F Christie1, V Bruce.   

Abstract

The effects of movement on unfamiliar face recognition were investigated. In an incidental learning task, faces were studied either as computer-animated (moving) displays or as a series of static images, with identical numbers of frames shown for each. The movements were either nonrigid transformations (changes in expression) or rigid rotations in depth (nodding or shaking). At test, participants saw either single, static images or moving sequences. Only one experiment showed a significant effect of study type, in favor of static instances. There was no additional advantage from studying faces in motion in these experiments, in which both study types showed the same amounts of information. Recognition memory was relatively unaffected by changes in expression between study and test. Effects of viewpoint change were large when expressive transformations had been studied but much smaller when rigid rotations in depth had been studied. The series of experiments did reveal a slight advantage for testing memory with moving compared with static faces, consistent with recent findings using familiar faces. Future work will need to examine whether such effects may also be due to the additional information provided by an animated sequence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9701969     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  The prototype effect in face recognition: extension and limits.

Authors:  R Cabeza; V Bruce; T Kato; M Oda
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

2.  Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces.

Authors:  J R Vokey; J D Read
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-05

3.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

4.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

5.  Aging and memory for faces versus single views of faces.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; J E Leslie
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-09

6.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993).

Authors:  M J Tarr; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Stability from variation: the case of face recognition. The M.D. Vernon Memorial Lecture.

Authors:  V Bruce
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1994-02

9.  Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression.

Authors:  J N Bassili
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Understanding face recognition.

Authors:  V Bruce; A Young
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1986-08
View more
  14 in total

1.  The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces.

Authors:  K Lander; F Christie; V Bruce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

2.  Repetition priming from moving faces.

Authors:  Karen Lander; Vicki Bruce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-06

3.  The contribution of symmetry and motion to the recognition of faces at novel orientations.

Authors:  Thomas A Busey; Safa R Zaki
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

4.  A search advantage for faces learned in motion.

Authors:  Karin S Pilz; Ian M Thornton; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Emotion unfolded by motion: a role for parietal lobe in decoding dynamic facial expressions.

Authors:  Pegah Sarkheil; Rainer Goebel; Frank Schneider; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Rigid facial motion influences featural, but not holistic, face processing.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Liezhong Ge; Kang Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The efficiency of dynamic and static facial expression recognition.

Authors:  Jason M Gold; Jarrett D Barker; Shawn Barr; Jennifer L Bittner; W Drew Bromfield; Nicole Chu; Roy A Goode; Doori Lee; Michael Simmons; Aparna Srinath
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  A Review and Clarification of the Terms "holistic," "configural," and "relational" in the Face Perception Literature.

Authors:  Daniel W Piepers; Rachel A Robbins
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-17

Review 9.  On the facilitative effects of face motion on face recognition and its development.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Steve Perrotta; Paul C Quinn; Zhe Wang; Yu-Hao P Sun; Kang Lee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-24

10.  Impaired perception of facial motion in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Justin O'Brien; Janine Spencer; Christine Girges; Alan Johnston; Harold Hill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.