Literature DB >> 11753041

Changing methods of imaging the common bile duct in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era in Western Australia: implications for surgical practice.

Nigel T Barwood1, Liora J Valinsky, Michael S T Hobbs, David R Fletcher, Matthew W Knuiman, Steve C Ridout.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), and surgical exploration of the common bile duct (CBD) associated with the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The optimal strategy for dealing with potential stones of the CBD during LC remains controversial.
METHODS: The authors conducted a population-based study of all cases of cholecystectomy (20,084) in Western Australia in the periods before, during, and after the introduction of LC (1988-1994). Index admissions were linked to previous or subsequent admissions for ERCP. Factors associated with ERCP were analyzed by multivariate regression models.
RESULTS: Between 1988 and 1994, admissions for ERCP almost doubled, whereas the use of IOC decreased from 71% to 51%. Different trends were found for open and laparoscopic procedures. Exploration of the CBD declined because of the infrequent use of this procedure in LC. Preoperative ERCP was significantly more common in older patients and men; the reverse was found for IOC. There was an adjusted 3.5-fold increase in preoperative ERCP both during and after the introduction of LC. The adjusted odds ratios for IOC were 0.48 and 0.52 for these periods.
CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of LC was associated with increasing reliance on ERCP to image the CBD and a decrease in the use of IOC. These changes were observed in both LC and open cholecystectomy. They suggest that the use of ERCP before cholecystectomy has partly replaced IOC for visualization of the CBD for suspected stones. Although more than 40% of patients undergoing LC had IOC, surgeons appear to be reluctant to perform surgical exploration of the CBD when stones are present. Savings in terms of both complications and cost can be expected if preoperative ERCPs performed for suspicion of uncomplicated CBD stones are replaced by IOC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11753041      PMCID: PMC1422394          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200201000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  29 in total

1.  An unusual complication of intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Heuberger; K Miller; J Hutter; E Moritz
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Routine versus selective intra-operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N J Soper; D L Dunnegan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Laparoscopic choledochoscopy: an effective approach to the common duct.

Authors:  B J Carroll; E H Phillips; L Daykhovsky; W S Grundfest; A Gershman; M Fallas; M Chandra
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1992-02

4.  Changes in the practice of biliary surgery and ERCP during the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to Australia: their possible significance.

Authors:  D R Fletcher
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1994-02

5.  Two pitfalls of laparoscopic balloon cholangiography: recognition and correction.

Authors:  V Velanovich; C Kaufmann
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Biliary injury at laparoscopic cholecystectomy: recognition and prevention.

Authors:  D R Fletcher
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1993-09

7.  Routine cholangiography is not warranted during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D G Clair; D L Carr-Locke; J M Becker; D C Brooks
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

8.  Safety, efficacy, cost, and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J E Kelley; R G Burrus; R P Burns; L D Graham; K E Chandler
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Management of acute cholangitis and the impact of endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  T Leese; J P Neoptolemos; A R Baker; D L Carr-Locke
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A P Legorreta; J H Silber; G N Costantino; R W Kobylinski; S L Zatz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993 Sep 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  11 in total

1.  Prospective study of scoring system in selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Sun; Xiao-Yan Cai; Jun-Da Li; Xiu-Jun Cai; Yi-Ping Mu; Jin-Min Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitalization: a 2-year experience.

Authors:  L Enochsson; B Lindberg; F Swahn; U Arnelo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Anatomic landmarks: their usefulness in safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K Singh; A Ohri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a case-control study comparing the short- and long-term outcomes for a "laparoscopy-first" attitude with the outcome for sequential treatment (systematic endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy).

Authors:  Renato Costi; Antonio Mazzeo; Francesco Tartamella; Christine Manceau; Bernard Vacher; Alain Valverde
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  [Laparoscopic versus endoscopic primary management of choledocholithiasis. A retrospective case-control study].

Authors:  G Sgourakis; S Lanitis; Ch Karaliotas; I Gockel; M Kaths; C Karaliotas
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Index admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with acute biliary symptoms: results from a specialist centre.

Authors:  Alastair L Young; Andrew J Cockbain; Alan W White; Adrian Hood; Krishna V Menon; Giles J Toogood
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  An audit of short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in Finland.

Authors:  Anne Mattila; Jussi Luhtala; Johanna Mrena; Hannu Kautiainen; Ilmo Kellokumpu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Temporal trends in utilization and outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis from 1998 to 2012.

Authors:  Malav P Parikh; Niyati M Gupta; Prashanthi N Thota; Rocio Lopez; Madhusudhan R Sanaka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Acute biliary pancreatitis, endoscopy, and laparoscopy.

Authors:  F Borie; A Fingerhut; B Millat
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy and laparoscopy.

Authors:  Renato Costi; Alessandro Gnocchi; Francesco Di Mario; Leopoldo Sarli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.