OBJECTIVES: Comparisons of cancer survival in Canadian and US metropolitan areas have shown consistent Canadian advantages. This study tests a health insurance hypothesis by comparing cancer survival in Toronto, Ontario, and Honolulu, Hawaii. METHODS: Ontario and Hawaii registries provided a total of 9190 and 2895 cancer cases (breast and prostate, 1986-1990, followed until 1996). Socioeconomic data for each person's residence at the time of diagnosis were taken from population censuses. RESULTS: Socioeconomic status and cancer survival were directly associated in the US cohort, but not in the Canadian cohort. Compared with similar patients in Honolulu, residents of low-income areas in Toronto experienced 5-year survival advantages for breast and prostate cancer. In support of the health insurance hypothesis, between-country differences were smaller than those observed with other state samples and the Canadian advantage was larger among younger women. CONCLUSIONS: Hawaii seems to provide better cancer care than many other states, but patients in Toronto still enjoy a significant survival advantage. Although Hawaii's employer-mandated health insurance coverage seems an effective step toward providing equitable health care, even better care could be expected with a universally accessible, single-payer system.
OBJECTIVES: Comparisons of cancer survival in Canadian and US metropolitan areas have shown consistent Canadian advantages. This study tests a health insurance hypothesis by comparing cancer survival in Toronto, Ontario, and Honolulu, Hawaii. METHODS: Ontario and Hawaii registries provided a total of 9190 and 2895 cancer cases (breast and prostate, 1986-1990, followed until 1996). Socioeconomic data for each person's residence at the time of diagnosis were taken from population censuses. RESULTS: Socioeconomic status and cancer survival were directly associated in the US cohort, but not in the Canadian cohort. Compared with similar patients in Honolulu, residents of low-income areas in Toronto experienced 5-year survival advantages for breast and prostate cancer. In support of the health insurance hypothesis, between-country differences were smaller than those observed with other state samples and the Canadian advantage was larger among younger women. CONCLUSIONS: Hawaii seems to provide better cancer care than many other states, but patients in Toronto still enjoy a significant survival advantage. Although Hawaii's employer-mandated health insurance coverage seems an effective step toward providing equitable health care, even better care could be expected with a universally accessible, single-payer system.
Authors: P Boffetta; F Merletti; F Faggiano; G Migliaretti; G Ferro; R Zanetti; B Terracini Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1997-06-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: J B McKinlay; R B Burns; R Durante; H A Feldman; K M Freund; B S Harrow; J T Irish; L E Kasten; M A Moskowitz Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Kevin M Gorey; Isaac N Luginaah; Kendra L Schwartz; Karen Y Fung; Madhan Balagurusamy; Emma Bartfay; Frances C Wright; Uzoamaka Anucha; Renee R Parsons Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2008-03-11 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Lorraine R Reitzel; Nga Nguyen; Mark E Zafereo; Guojun Li; Qingyi Wei; Erich M Sturgis Journal: Health Place Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Kevin M Gorey; Isaac N Luginaah; Karen Y Fung; Emma Bartfay; Caroline Hamm; Frances C Wright; Madhan Balagurusamy; Eric J Holowaty Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Gordon H Guyatt; Pj Devereaux; Joel Lexchin; Samuel B Stone; Armine Yalnizyan; David Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler; Qi Zhou; Laurie J Goldsmith; Deborah J Cook; Ted Haines; Christina Lacchetti; John N Lavis; Terrence Sullivan; Ed Mills; Shelley Kraus; Neera Bhatnagar Journal: Open Med Date: 2007-04-14