Literature DB >> 10998669

Colorectal cancer screening 2000: the role of colonoscopy in average-risk individuals.

W E Smalley1, G M Eisen.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer fulfills all of the criteria of a disease process that is suitable for a screening program. Several screening tests are effective in preventing mortality from colorectal cancer and are widely recommended. Despite the lack of direct comparisons, there is compelling indirect evidence that programs using colonoscopy as the primary tool are likely to be more effective than programs using fecal occult blood testing or flexible sigmoidoscopy as initial strategies. Colonoscopy-first programs are more expensive initially, but their cost effectiveness may prove to be comparable with the currently recommended programs in certain settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10998669     DOI: 10.1007/s11894-000-0041-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep        ISSN: 1522-8037


  30 in total

1.  A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group.

Authors:  S J Winawer; E T Stewart; A G Zauber; J H Bond; H Ansel; J D Waye; D Hall; J A Hamlin; M Schapiro; M J O'Brien; S S Sternberg; L S Gottlieb
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Clinical economics. A guide to the economic analysis of clinical practices.

Authors:  J M Eisenberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-11-24       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Cost-utility of one-time colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer at various ages.

Authors:  R M Ness; A M Holmes; R Klein; R Dittus
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger; J Olsen; O D Jørgensen; O Søndergaard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Natural history of untreated colonic polyps.

Authors:  S J Stryker; B G Wolff; C E Culp; S D Libbe; D M Ilstrup; R L MacCarty
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Polyps and cancer of the large bowel: a necropsy study in Liverpool.

Authors:  A R Williams; B A Balasooriya; D W Day
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by once-only sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  W S Atkin; J Cuzick; J M Northover; D K Whynes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-03-20       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Protection by endoscopy against death from colorectal cancer. A case-control study among veterans.

Authors:  A D Müller; A Sonnenberg
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-09-11

10.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.