Literature DB >> 19442479

Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006-2007.

Carrie N Klabunde1, David Lanier, Marion R Nadel, Caroline McLeod, Gigi Yuan, Sally W Vernon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians (hereafter, physicians) play a critical role in the delivery of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the U.S. This study describes the CRC screening recommendations and practices of U.S. physicians and compares them to findings from a 1999-2000 national provider survey.
METHODS: Data from 1266 physicians responding to the 2006-2007 National Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Recommendations and Practices for Breast, Cervical, Colorectal, and Lung Cancer Screening (cooperation rate=75%) were analyzed in 2008. Descriptive statistics were used to examine physicians' CRC screening recommendations and practices as well as the office systems used to support screening activities. Sample weights were applied in the analyses to obtain national estimates.
RESULTS: Ninety-five percent of physicians routinely recommend screening colonoscopy to asymptomatic, average-risk patients; 80% recommend fecal occult blood testing (FOBT). Only a minority recommend sigmoidoscopy, double-contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, or fecal DNA testing. Fifty-six percent recommend two screening modalities; 17% recommend one. Nearly all physicians who recommend endoscopy refer their patients for the procedure. Four percent perform sigmoidoscopy, a 25-percentage-point decline from 1999-2000. Although 61% of physicians reported that their practice had guidelines for CRC screening, only 30% use provider reminders; 15% use patient reminders.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' CRC screening recommendations and practices have changed substantially since 1999-2000. Colonoscopy is now the most frequently recommended test. Most physicians do not recommend the full menu of test options prescribed in national guidelines. Few perform sigmoidoscopy. Office systems to support CRC screening are lacking in many physicians' practices. Given ongoing changes in CRC screening technologies and guidelines, the continued monitoring of physicians' CRC screening recommendations and practices is imperative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19442479      PMCID: PMC2727732          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  42 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer prevention 2000: screening recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  D K Rex; D A Johnson; D A Lieberman; R W Burt; A Sonnenberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  A national survey of primary care physicians' colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Paul S Frame; Ann Meadow; Elizabeth Jones; Marion Nadel; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 4.  Adherence with colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a review.

Authors:  Sujha Subramanian; Michelle Klosterman; Mayur M Amonkar; Timothy L Hunt
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Andrew C von Eschenbach; Bernard Levin; Carmel Cohen; Carolyn D Runowicz; Stephen Sener; Debbie Saslow; Harmon J Eyre
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy.

Authors:  Pauline A Mysliwiec; Martin L Brown; Carrie N Klabunde; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence.

Authors:  Sidney Winawer; Robert Fletcher; Douglas Rex; John Bond; Randall Burt; Joseph Ferrucci; Theodore Ganiats; Theodore Levin; Steven Woolf; David Johnson; Lynne Kirk; Scott Litin; Clifford Simmang
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: a population-based study.

Authors:  Nancy K Janz; Patricia A Wren; David Schottenfeld; Kenneth E Guire
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Trends in colorectal cancer test use in the medicare population, 1998-2005.

Authors:  Anna P Schenck; Sharon C Peacock; Carrie N Klabunde; Pauline Lapin; Jim F Coan; Martin L Brown
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 10.  Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  100 in total

1.  Physician awareness and referral to national smoking cessation quitlines and web-based resources.

Authors:  Lila J Finney Rutten; Kia Davis; Linda Squiers; Erik Augustson; Kelly Blake
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Leona K Bartholomew; Amy McQueen; Judy L Bettencourt; Anthony Greisinger; Sharon P Coan; David Lairson; Wenyaw Chan; S T Hawley; R E Myers
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-06

3.  A computerized intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening for underserved populations: theoretical background and algorithm development.

Authors:  K Allen Greiner; Mugur V Geana; Aaron Epp; Angela Watson; Melissa Filippi; Christine Makosky Daley; Kimberly K Engelman; Aimee S James; Marci Campbell
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.285

4.  Experience of a public health colorectal cancer testing program in Maryland.

Authors:  Diane M Dwyer; Carmela Groves; Annette Hopkins; Eithne Keelaghan; Fatma M Shebl; Barbara Andrews; Marsha Bienia; Eileen Steinberger
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests and screening test use in a large multispecialty primary care practice.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Amy McQueen; L Kay Bartholomew; Anthony J Greisinger; Sharon P Coan; Ronald Myers; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in a US cohort according to site of cancer and colonoscopist specialty.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Joan L Warren; Michael J Barrett; Therese A Stukel; V Paul Doria-Rose
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Computational modeling and multilevel cancer control interventions.

Authors:  Joseph P Morrissey; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Rebecca Anhang Price; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

8.  The Relationship between the Methylated Septin-9 DNA Blood Test and Stool Occult Blood Test for Diagnosing Colorectal Cancer in Taiwanese People.

Authors:  Chung-Hung Chen; Sheng-Lei Yan; Tsung-Hsun Yang; Shih-Feng Chen; Yung-Hsiang Yeh; Jing-Jim Ou; Chien-Hua Lin; Yueh-Tsung Lee; Chien-Hua Chen
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.352

9.  Reasons for non-response to a direct-mailed FIT kit program: lessons learned from a pragmatic colorectal-cancer screening study in a federally sponsored health center.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Jennifer L Schneider; Jennifer J Sanchez; Amanda F Petrik; Beverly Green
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Cost-effectiveness of a standard intervention versus a navigated intervention on colorectal cancer screening use in primary care.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Melissa Dicarlo; Ashish A Deshmuk; Heather B Fagan; Randa Sifri; Nora Katurakes; James Cocroft; Jocelyn Sendecki; Heidi Swan; Sally W Vernon; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.