Literature DB >> 10071873

Dose calculation models for proton treatment planning using a dynamic beam delivery system: an attempt to include density heterogeneity effects in the analytical dose calculation.

B Schaffner1, E Pedroni, A Lomax.   

Abstract

The gantry for proton radiotherapy at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) is designed specifically for the spot-scanning technique. Use of this technique to its full potential requires dose calculation algorithms which are capable of precisely simulating each scanned beam individually. Different specialized analytical dose calculations have been developed, which attempt to model the effects of density heterogeneities in the patient's body on the dose. Their accuracy has been evaluated by a comparison with Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions in the case of a simple geometrical density interface parallel to the beam and typical anatomical situations. A specialized ray casting model which takes range dilution effects (broadening of the spectrum of proton ranges) into account has been found to produce results of good accuracy. This algorithm can easily be implemented in the iterative optimization procedure used for the calculation of the optimal contribution of each individual scanned pencil beam. In most cases an elemental pencil beam dose calculation has been found to be most accurate. Due to the long computing time, this model is currently used only after the optimization procedure as an alternative method of calculating the dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10071873     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/1/004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  43 in total

1.  A GPU implementation of a track-repeating algorithm for proton radiotherapy dose calculations.

Authors:  Pablo P Yepes; Dragan Mirkovic; Phillip J Taddei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A generalized 2D pencil beam scaling algorithm for proton dose calculation in heterogeneous slab geometries.

Authors:  David C Westerly; Xiaohu Mo; Wolfgang A Tomé; Thomas R Mackie; Paul M DeLuca
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Impact of range shifter material on proton pencil beam spot characteristics.

Authors:  Jiajian Shen; Wei Liu; Aman Anand; Joshua B Stoker; Xiaoning Ding; Mirek Fatyga; Michael G Herman; Martin Bues
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Treatment planning for proton therapy: what is needed in the next 10 years?

Authors:  Hakan Nystrom; Maria Fuglsang Jensen; Petra Witt Nystrom
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  An evaluation of spatial resolution of a prototype proton CT scanner.

Authors:  Tia E Plautz; V Bashkirov; V Giacometti; R F Hurley; R P Johnson; P Piersimoni; H F-W Sadrozinski; R W Schulte; A Zatserklyaniy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Benchmark measurements and simulations of dose perturbations due to metallic spheres in proton beams.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Laura Rechner; Dragan Mirkovic; Pablo Yepes; Nicholas C Koch; Uwe Titt; Jonas D Fontenot; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 7.  Advanced Proton Beam Dosimetry Part I: review and performance evaluation of dose calculation algorithms.

Authors:  Jatinder Saini; Erik Traneus; Dominic Maes; Rajesh Regmi; Stephen R Bowen; Charles Bloch; Tony Wong
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04

8.  Beyond Gaussians: a study of single-spot modeling for scanning proton dose calculation.

Authors:  Yupeng Li; Ronald X Zhu; Narayan Sahoo; Aman Anand; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Monte Carlo fast dose calculator for proton radiotherapy: application to a voxelized geometry representing a patient with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pablo Yepes; Sharmalee Randeniya; Phillip J Taddei; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Can megavoltage computed tomography reduce proton range uncertainties in treatment plans for patients with large metal implants?

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Annelise Giebeler; Katja M Langen; Dragan Mirkovic; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.