Literature DB >> 9990621

Defibrillation efficacy of different electrode placements in a human thorax model.

A L de Jongh1, E G Entcheva, J A Replogle, R S Booker, B H Kenknight, F J Claydon.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to measure the defibrillation threshold (DFT) associated with different electrode placements using a three-dimensional anatomically realistic finite element model of the human thorax. Coil electrodes (Endotak DSP, model 125, Guidant/CPI) were placed in the RV apex along the lateral wall (RV), withdrawn 10 mm away from the RV apex along the lateral wall (RVprox), in the RV apex along the anterior septum (RVseptal), and in the SVC. An active pulse generator (can) was placed in the subcutaneous prepectoral space. Five electrode configurations were studied: RV-->SVC, RVprox-->SVC, RVSEPTAL-->SVC, RV-->Can, and RV-->SVC + Can. DFTs are defined as the energy required to produce a potential gradient of at least 5 V/cm in 95% of the ventricular myocardium. DFTs for RV-->SVC, RVprox-->SVC, RVseptal-->SVC, RV-->Can, and RV-->SVC + Can were 10, 16, 7, 9, and 6 J, respectively. The DFTs measured at each configuration fell within one standard deviation of the mean DFTs reported in clinical studies using the Endotak leads. The relative changes in DFT among electrode configurations also compared favorably. This computer model allows measurements of DFT or other defibrillation parameters with several different electrode configurations saving time and cost of clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9990621     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00323.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  9 in total

Review 1.  How computer simulations of the human heart can improve anti-arrhythmia therapy.

Authors:  Natalia A Trayanova; Kelly C Chang
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Finite element modeling of subcutaneous implantable defibrillator electrodes in an adult torso.

Authors:  Matthew Jolley; Jeroen Stinstra; Jess Tate; Steve Pieper; Rob Macleod; Larry Chu; Paul Wang; John K Triedman
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Placement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in paediatric and congenital heart defect patients: a pipeline for model generation and simulation prediction of optimal configurations.

Authors:  Lukas J Rantner; Fijoy Vadakkumpadan; Philip J Spevak; Jane E Crosson; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Predictive modeling of defibrillation using hexahedral and tetrahedral finite element models: recent advances.

Authors:  John K Triedman; Matthew Jolley; Jeroen Stinstra; Dana H Brooks; Rob MacLeod
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 1.438

5.  A computer modeling tool for comparing novel ICD electrode orientations in children and adults.

Authors:  Matthew Jolley; Jeroen Stinstra; Steve Pieper; Rob Macleod; Dana H Brooks; Frank Cecchin; John K Triedman
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 6.343

6.  Esophageal electric fields are predictive of atrial cardioversion success-a finite element analysis.

Authors:  David A Fitch; Amy L de Jongh Curry
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-08

7.  Virtual 3D heart models to aid pacemaker implantation in children.

Authors:  Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2014-01

8.  Development of an Anatomically Realistic Forward Solver for Thoracic Electrical Impedance Tomography.

Authors:  Fei Yang; Jie Zhang; Robert Patterson
Journal:  J Med Eng       Date:  2013-03-24

9.  Generation of a cohort of whole-torso cardiac models for assessing the utility of a novel computed shock vector efficiency metric for ICD optimisation.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Plancke; Adam Connolly; Philip M Gemmell; Aurel Neic; Luke C McSpadden; John Whitaker; Mark O'Neill; Christopher A Rinaldi; Ronak Rajani; Steven A Niederer; Gernot Plank; Martin J Bishop
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.589

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.