| Literature DB >> 27006927 |
Fei Yang1, Jie Zhang2, Robert Patterson3.
Abstract
Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has the potential to provide a low cost and safe imaging modality for clinically monitoring patients being treated with mechanical ventilation. Variations in reconstruction algorithms at different clinical settings, however, make interpretation of regional ventilation across institutions difficult, presenting the need for a unified algorithm for thoracic EIT reconstruction. Development of such a consensual reconstruction algorithm necessitates a forward model capable of predicting surface impedance measurements as well as electric fields in the interior of the modeled thoracic volume. In this paper, we present an anatomically realistic forward solver for thoracic EIT that was built based on high resolution MR image data of a representative adult. Accuracy assessment of the developed forward solver in predicting surface impedance measurements by comparing the predicted and observed impedance measurements shows that the relative error is within the order of 5%, demonstrating the ability of the presented forward solver in generating high-fidelity surface thoracic impedance data for thoracic EIT algorithm development and evaluation.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 27006927 PMCID: PMC4782630 DOI: 10.1155/2013/983938
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Eng ISSN: 2314-5129
Conductivity values of the major tissues.
| Tissue | Conductivity (S/m) |
|---|---|
| Air | 10−18 |
| Lung | 0.0714 |
| Blood | 0.6667 |
| Heart muscle | 0.4 |
| Liver and kidney | 0.1667 |
| Skeletal muscle | 0.4444 |
| Fat, bone, and cartilage | 0.05 |
Figure 1Sample of a segmented axial image. Inferior view at T6 vertebral level.
Figure 2A screen shot of the developed GUI. Electrodes are paired and numbered to show the default adjacent excitation scheme.
Percentage of difference between the predicted and observed impedance measurements.
| Voltage pick-up electrode pair | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | ||
| Current excitation electrode pair | 1 | 2.2 | −2.1 | −3.9 | 1.5 | −0.7 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 1.0 | −2.8 | −1.5 | 0.1 | −1.2 | −4.0 | |||
| 2 | −2.5 | −4.6 | −3.3 | 0.3 | −4.1 | −3.0 | 4.2 | 1.1 | −2.3 | 0.6 | −0.9 | −4.8 | 2.4 | ||||
| 3 | 3.7 | −0.5 | −0.9 | 4.9 | 3.5 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 2.6 | −1.5 | 0.5 | 2.9 | 0.6 | −3.0 | ||||
| 4 | −4.1 | −4.6 | −0.5 | 1.6 | −3.3 | −4.1 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 3.9 | 4.7 | ||||
| 5 | −1.3 | −1.6 | −1.9 | 3.4 | −0.4 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 4.0 | −0.5 | −0.1 | 0.3 | 2.4 | −4.3 | ||||
| 6 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 1.8 | 3.4 | −5.0 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 3.7 | 2.0 | −0.1 | 2.7 | 0.9 | −2.3 | ||||
| 7 | 2.2 | −3.5 | −4.5 | 3.8 | −3.4 | 3.5 | 0.8 | −4.4 | −2.4 | −3.2 | −3.4 | −0.9 | 0.1 | ||||
| 8 | −0.5 | −4.3 | 4.7 | 0.0 | 2.5 | −2.5 | 4.5 | −4.6 | 3.1 | −2.9 | 3.1 | 2.4 | −0.8 | ||||
| 9 | −4.6 | −1.8 | 0.6 | −4.6 | −3.1 | 1.2 | 3.3 | −0.8 | −1.9 | −1.4 | 2.7 | −1.0 | 2.6 | ||||
| 10 | −4.6 | −2.6 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 2.6 | −0.7 | −1.0 | −4.6 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 3.3 | −2.1 | 0.4 | ||||
| 11 | 3.4 | −2.4 | −2.7 | −0.9 | −4.3 | 4.2 | 2.4 | 5.0 | −0.5 | −3.1 | 2.7 | 2.8 | −4.6 | ||||
| 12 | −4.7 | 1.1 | −3.0 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 4.5 | −1.5 | −2.7 | 3.6 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 3.8 | −0.5 | ||||
| 13 | −4.6 | −1.6 | 3.1 | −2.5 | 3.0 | −0.3 | −1.9 | −3.2 | −3.5 | 1.6 | −3.2 | 2.0 | −0.2 | ||||
| 14 | 0.1 | 3.3 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 2.5 | −2.8 | −2.5 | −3.7 | −1.2 | −4.0 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 2.7 | ||||
| 15 | −3.0 | −2.1 | 0.5 | −0.1 | −1.2 | −4.3 | 0.5 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 4.6 | −4.3 | −3.8 | ||||
| 16 | 4.7 | −1.5 | −2.0 | 0.3 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 1.0 | −0.1 | 3.9 | 3.3 | −2.8 | −0.5 | 3.2 | ||||
Figure 3Conductivity differential images reconstructed with the Sheffield filtered backprojection algorithm. (a) Conductivities of both lungs were changed from 0.0714 S/m to 0.1000 S/m; (b) conductivities of both lungs were changed from 0.0714 S/m to 0.0556 S/m; (c) conductivity of the right lung was changed from 0.0714 S/m to 0.1000 S/m; (d) conductivity of the right lung was changed from 0.0714 S/m to 0.0556 S/m.
Figure 4Conductivity differential images reconstructed with the GREIT algorithm. (a) Conductivities of both lungs were changed from 0.0714 S/m to 0.1000 S/m; (b) conductivities of both lungs were changed from 0.0714 S/m to 0.0556 S/m; (c) conductivity of the right lung was changed from 0.0714 S/m to 0.1000 S/m; (d) conductivity of the right lung was changed from 0.0714 S/m to 0.0556 S/m.