BACKGROUND: Use of implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) in children and patients with congenital heart disease is complicated by body size and anatomy. A variety of creative implantation techniques has been used empirically in these groups on an ad hoc basis. OBJECTIVE: To rationalize ICD placement in special populations, we used subject-specific, image-based finite element models (FEMs) to compare electric fields and expected defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) using standard and novel electrode configurations. METHODS: FEMs were created by segmenting normal torso computed tomography scans of subjects ages 2, 10, and 29 years and 1 adult with congenital heart disease into tissue compartments, meshing, and assigning tissue conductivities. The FEMs were modified by interactive placement of ICD electrode models in clinically relevant electrode configurations, and metrics of relative defibrillation safety and efficacy were calculated. RESULTS: Predicted DFTs for standard transvenous configurations were comparable with published results. Although transvenous systems generally predicted lower DFTs, a variety of extracardiac orientations were also predicted to be comparably effective in children and adults. Significant trend effects on DFTs were associated with body size and electrode length. In many situations, small alterations in electrode placement and patient anatomy resulted in significant variation of predicted DFT. We also show patient-specific use of this technique for optimization of electrode placement. CONCLUSION: Image-based FEMs allow predictive modeling of defibrillation scenarios and predict large changes in DFTs with clinically relevant variations of electrode placement. Extracardiac ICDs are predicted to be effective in both children and adults. This approach may aid both ICD development and patient-specific optimization of electrode placement. Further development and validation are needed for clinical or industrial utilization.
BACKGROUND: Use of implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) in children and patients with congenital heart disease is complicated by body size and anatomy. A variety of creative implantation techniques has been used empirically in these groups on an ad hoc basis. OBJECTIVE: To rationalize ICD placement in special populations, we used subject-specific, image-based finite element models (FEMs) to compare electric fields and expected defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) using standard and novel electrode configurations. METHODS: FEMs were created by segmenting normal torso computed tomography scans of subjects ages 2, 10, and 29 years and 1 adult with congenital heart disease into tissue compartments, meshing, and assigning tissue conductivities. The FEMs were modified by interactive placement of ICD electrode models in clinically relevant electrode configurations, and metrics of relative defibrillation safety and efficacy were calculated. RESULTS: Predicted DFTs for standard transvenous configurations were comparable with published results. Although transvenous systems generally predicted lower DFTs, a variety of extracardiac orientations were also predicted to be comparably effective in children and adults. Significant trend effects on DFTs were associated with body size and electrode length. In many situations, small alterations in electrode placement and patient anatomy resulted in significant variation of predicted DFT. We also show patient-specific use of this technique for optimization of electrode placement. CONCLUSION: Image-based FEMs allow predictive modeling of defibrillation scenarios and predict large changes in DFTs with clinically relevant variations of electrode placement. Extracardiac ICDs are predicted to be effective in both children and adults. This approach may aid both ICD development and patient-specific optimization of electrode placement. Further development and validation are needed for clinical or industrial utilization.
Authors: Fayez Bokhari; David Newman; Mary Greene; Victoria Korley; Iqwal Mangat; Paul Dorian Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-07-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Thomas Kriebel; Wolfgang Ruschewski; Maria Gonzalez y Gonzalez; Katharina Walter; Johannes Kroll; Christoph Kampmann; Markus Heinemann; Heike Schneider; Thomas Paul Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Elizabeth A Stephenson; Anjan S Batra; Timothy K Knilans; Robert M Gow; Rainer Gradaus; Seshadri Balaji; Anne M Dubin; Edward K Rhee; Pamela S Ro; Anna M Thøgersen; Frank Cecchin; John K Triedman; Edward P Walsh; Charles I Berul Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2006-01
Authors: Mark E Alexander; Frank Cecchin; Edward P Walsh; John K Triedman; Laura M Bevilacqua; Charles I Berul Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2004-01
Authors: Jess Tate; Jeroen Stinstra; Thomas Pilcher; Ahrash Poursaid; Matthew A Jolley; Elizabeth Saarel; John Triedman; Rob S MacLeod Journal: Comput Biol Med Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 4.589
Authors: Matthew Jolley; Jeroen Stinstra; Jess Tate; Steve Pieper; Rob Macleod; Larry Chu; Paul Wang; John K Triedman Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2010-02-01 Impact factor: 6.343