Literature DB >> 9988408

Cytogenetic diagnosis of "normal 46,XX" karyotypes in spontaneous abortions frequently may be misleading.

K A Bell1, P G Van Deerlin, B R Haddad, R F Feinberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use the molecular identification of Y chromosome material in products of conception cytogenetically diagnosed as "46,XX" to confirm the occurrence of inaccurate cytogenetic test results most likely attributable to maternal cell contamination.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENT(S): Thirty-four archival tissues from cases of spontaneous abortion with a "46,XX" karyotype based on cytogenetic analysis. INTERVENTION(S): Maternal and villus DNA were extracted from microdissected, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival tissues. The presence of the X and Y chromosomes was detected with the use of polymerase chain reaction assays and confirmed with fluorescence in situ hybridization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Accuracy of cytogenetic evaluation of products of conception. RESULT(S): Four (29%) of 14 first trimester and 1 (5%) of 20 second trimester "46,XX" pregnancy losses contained Y chromosome-specific DNA and demonstrated a single X chromosome-specific allele by polymerase chain reaction analysis consistent with an "XY" karyotype. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was confirmatory in 4 of 5 samples that demonstrated single X and Y signals in villus cells. CONCLUSION(S): Inaccuracy exists in the cytogenetic analysis of early products of conception that most likely is due to maternal cell contamination. In the absence of confirmatory testing, such as with a "DNA fingerprinting" assay, reports of a "46,XX" karyotype should be used cautiously in patient counseling and management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9988408     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00445-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  28 in total

1.  Tissue sampling technique affects accuracy of karyotype from missed abortions.

Authors:  Ruth B Lathi; Amin A Milki
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages.

Authors:  Anthony J Schaeffer; June Chung; Konstantina Heretis; Andrew Wong; David H Ledbetter; Christa Lese Martin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Application of touch FISH in the study of mosaic tetraploidy and maternal cell contamination in pregnancy losses.

Authors:  Sofia Dória; Vera Lima; Berta Carvalho; Maria Lina Moreira; Mário Sousa; Alberto Barros; Filipa Carvalho
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Cytogenetic testing of anembryonic pregnancies compared to embryonic missed abortions.

Authors:  Ruth B Lathi; Sara D Mark; Lynn M Westphal; Amin A Milki
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Testing for maternal cell contamination in prenatal samples: a comprehensive survey of current diagnostic practices in 35 molecular diagnostic laboratories.

Authors:  Iris Schrijver; Sarah C Cherny; James L Zehnder
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.568

6.  First-trimester euploid miscarriages analysed by array-CGH.

Authors:  Chiara Donatella Viaggi; S Cavani; M Malacarne; F Floriddia; G Zerega; C Baldo; M Mogni; M Castagnetta; G Piombo; D A Coviello; F Camandona; D Lijoi; W Insegno; M Traversa; M Pierluigi
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Chromosome distribution of early miscarriages with present or absent embryos: female predominance.

Authors:  Hsin-Hsin Cheng; Chia-Yu Ou; Ching-Chang Tsai; Shuenn-Dyh Chang; Pi-Yu Hsiao; Kuo-Chung Lan; Te-Yao Hsu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Comparative genomic hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions.

Authors:  B Lomax; S Tang; E Separovic; D Phillips; E Hillard; T Thomson; D K Kalousek
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03-30       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Karyotype evaluation of repeated abortions in primary and secondary recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  T V Nikitina; E A Sazhenova; D I Zhigalina; E N Tolmacheva; N N Sukhanova; I N Lebedev
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples.

Authors:  Björn Menten; Katrien Swerts; Barbara Delle Chiaie; Sandra Janssens; Karen Buysse; Jan Philippé; Frank Speleman
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 2.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.