Literature DB >> 15127362

Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages.

Anthony J Schaeffer1, June Chung, Konstantina Heretis, Andrew Wong, David H Ledbetter, Christa Lese Martin.   

Abstract

Miscarriage is a condition that affects 10%-15% of all clinically recognized pregnancies, most of which occur in the first trimester. Approximately 50% of first-trimester miscarriages result from fetal chromosome abnormalities. Currently, G-banded chromosome analysis is used to determine if large-scale genetic imbalances are the cause of these pregnancy losses. This technique relies on the culture of cells derived from the fetus, a technique that has many limitations, including a high rate of culture failure, maternal overgrowth of fetal cells, and poor chromosome morphology. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)-array analysis is a powerful new molecular cytogenetic technique that allows genomewide analysis of DNA copy number. By hybridizing patient DNA and normal reference DNA to arrays of genomic clones, unbalanced gains or losses of genetic material across the genome can be detected. In this study, 41 product-of-conception (POC) samples, which were previously analyzed by G-banding, were tested using CGH arrays to determine not only if the array could identify all reported abnormalities, but also whether any previously undetected genomic imbalances would be discovered. The array methodology detected all abnormalities as reported by G-banding analysis and revealed new abnormalities in 4/41 (9.8%) cases. Of those, one trisomy 21 POC was also mosaic for trisomy 20, one had a duplication of the 10q telomere region, one had an interstitial deletion of chromosome 9p, and the fourth had an interstitial duplication of the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome region on chromosome 15q, which, if maternally inherited, has been implicated in autism. This retrospective study demonstrates that the DNA-based CGH-array technology overcomes many of the limitations of routine cytogenetic analysis of POC samples while enhancing the detection of fetal chromosome aberrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15127362      PMCID: PMC1182080          DOI: 10.1086/421250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  22 in total

Review 1.  Genetic aspects of miscarriage.

Authors:  M Goddijn; N J Leschot
Journal:  Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2000-10

2.  Comparative genomic hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions.

Authors:  B Lomax; S Tang; E Separovic; D Phillips; E Hillard; T Thomson; D K Kalousek
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03-30       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Autism or atypical autism in maternally but not paternally derived proximal 15q duplication.

Authors:  E H Cook; V Lindgren; B L Leventhal; R Courchesne; A Lincoln; C Shulman; C Lord; E Courchesne
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions.

Authors:  T Hassold; N Chen; J Funkhouser; T Jooss; B Manuel; J Matsuura; A Matsuyama; C Wilson; J A Yamane; P A Jacobs
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 1.670

5.  Diagnosis of aneuploidy in archival, paraffin-embedded pregnancy-loss tissues by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  K A Bell; P G Van Deerlin; R F Feinberg; S du Manoir; B R Haddad
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Cytogenetic diagnosis of "normal 46,XX" karyotypes in spontaneous abortions frequently may be misleading.

Authors:  K A Bell; P G Van Deerlin; B R Haddad; R F Feinberg
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors.

Authors:  A Kallioniemi; O P Kallioniemi; D Sudar; D Rutovitz; J W Gray; F Waldman; D Pinkel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Genomic microarrays in human genetic disease and cancer.

Authors:  Donna G Albertson; Daniel Pinkel
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Detection of chromosomal aberration in fetuses arising from recurrent spontaneous abortion by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  M Daniely; A Aviram-Goldring; G Barkai; B Goldman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the genomewide detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Lisenka E L M Vissers; Bert B A de Vries; Kazutoyo Osoegawa; Irene M Janssen; Ton Feuth; Chik On Choy; Huub Straatman; Walter van der Vliet; Erik H L P G Huys; Anke van Rijk; Dominique Smeets; Conny M A van Ravenswaaij-Arts; Nine V Knoers; Ineke van der Burgt; Pieter J de Jong; Han G Brunner; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Eric F P M Schoenmakers; Joris A Veltman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  From prenatal genomic diagnosis to fetal personalized medicine: progress and challenges.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  Molecular genetic studies of complete hydatidiform moles.

Authors:  Louise Carey; Benjamin M Nash; Dale C Wright
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2015-04

3.  Prenatal detection of unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements by array CGH.

Authors:  L Rickman; H Fiegler; C Shaw-Smith; R Nash; V Cirigliano; G Voglino; B L Ng; C Scott; J Whittaker; M Adinolfi; N P Carter; M Bobrow
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  First-trimester euploid miscarriages analysed by array-CGH.

Authors:  Chiara Donatella Viaggi; S Cavani; M Malacarne; F Floriddia; G Zerega; C Baldo; M Mogni; M Castagnetta; G Piombo; D A Coviello; F Camandona; D Lijoi; W Insegno; M Traversa; M Pierluigi
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Genomic characteristics of miscarriage copy number variants.

Authors:  Hani Bagheri; Eloi Mercier; Ying Qiao; Mary D Stephenson; Evica Rajcan-Separovic
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  Genetic effects of a 13q31.1 microdeletion detected by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT).

Authors:  Yifang Jia; Heyong Zhao; Donghong Shi; Wen Peng; Luwen Xie; Wei Wang; Fuman Jiang; Hongyun Zhang; Xietong Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-09-15

7.  Genome-wide array-based copy number profiling in human placentas from unexplained stillbirths.

Authors:  R Alan Harris; Francesca Ferrari; Shay Ben-Shachar; Xiaoling Wang; George Saade; Ignatia Van Den Veyver; Fabio Facchinetti; Kjersti Aagaard-Tillery
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 8.  Application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization to clinical diagnostics.

Authors:  Bassem A Bejjani; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.568

9.  Karyotype versus microarray testing for genetic abnormalities after stillbirth.

Authors:  Uma M Reddy; Grier P Page; George R Saade; Robert M Silver; Vanessa R Thorsten; Corette B Parker; Halit Pinar; Marian Willinger; Barbara J Stoll; Josefine Heim-Hall; Michael W Varner; Robert L Goldenberg; Radek Bukowski; Ronald J Wapner; Carolyn D Drews-Botsch; Barbara M O'Brien; Donald J Dudley; Brynn Levy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples.

Authors:  Björn Menten; Katrien Swerts; Barbara Delle Chiaie; Sandra Janssens; Karen Buysse; Jan Philippé; Frank Speleman
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 2.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.