Literature DB >> 9934343

Current and projected annual direct costs of screening asymptomatic men for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen.

M D Krahn1, A Coombs, I G Levy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concern over the cost of screening for asymptomatic prostate cancer by means of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing has played an important role in PSA screening policy. However, little is known about the true costs of current PSA screening in Canada and how costs may change in the future.
METHODS: The authors performed a cost identification study from the perspective of provincial ministries of health. They used data from published reports, hospital discharge data, claims data from several provinces, a laboratory survey, a national survey of knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about screening, a provincial cancer registry and expert opinion to estimate current first-year screening costs. Using demographic data from Statistics Canada and various scenarios regarding changes in screening patterns, the authors derived estimates of the future costs of PSA screening.
RESULTS: In 1995 PSA screening cost an estimated $45 million (range $40 million to $84 million). Treatment accounted for over 61% of total costs, whereas screening, diagnosis and staging accounted for 35%. Screening all eligible men in Canada in 1995 would have cost $317 million (range $356 million to $691 million), more than the costs of all prostate cancer care in that year. Annual recurrent screening for all eligible men in 2005 would cost $219 million (range $208 million to $412 million). Projections from existing trends suggest that annual costs of PSA screening in 2000 are likely to increase from the estimated $45 million to approximately $66 million (range $59 million to $126 million).
INTERPRETATION: PSA screening is costly, but even universal screening would consume a smaller share of national health expenditures than previous studies have suggested. Costs attributable to PSA screening may increase in the future owing to changes in utilization patterns and demographic shifts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9934343      PMCID: PMC1229945     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  32 in total

1.  The state of the art of cost-of-illness estimates.

Authors:  T A Hodgson
Journal:  Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res       Date:  1983

2.  How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations.

Authors:  A Laupacis; D Feeny; A S Detsky; P X Tugwell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Philosophical origins of the economic valuation of life.

Authors:  J C Robinson
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 4.  Clinical economics. A guide to the economic analysis of clinical practices.

Authors:  J M Eisenberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-11-24       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The cost of prostatic cancer in a defined population.

Authors:  P Carlsson; H Hjertberg; B Jönsson; E Varenhorst
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1989

Review 6.  A clinician's guide to cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A S Detsky; I G Naglie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  The measurement iterative loop: a framework for the critical appraisal of need, benefits and costs of health interventions.

Authors:  P Tugwell; K J Bennett; D L Sackett; R B Haynes
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1985

Review 8.  Economics of screening for carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  S A Optenberg; I M Thompson
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.241

9.  Detection of organ-confined prostate cancer is increased through prostate-specific antigen-based screening.

Authors:  W J Catalona; D S Smith; T L Ratliff; J W Basler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-25       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The role of increasing detection in the rising incidence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A L Potosky; B A Miller; P C Albertsen; B S Kramer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Global registries for measuring pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life outcomes: focus on design and data collection, analysis and interpretation.

Authors:  Lisa Kennedy; Ann-Marie Craig
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  C Hamashima; K Yoshida
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 3.  Screening for bladder cancer: a perspective.

Authors:  Yair Lotan; Robert S Svatek; Núria Malats
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Quality of life and economic considerations in the management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marco Turini; Alberto Redaelli; Paola Gramegna; Davide Radice
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)-Based Population Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Economic Analysis.

Authors:  A Tawfik
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2015-05-01

6.  Financial toxicity: a potential side effect of prostate cancer treatment among Australian men.

Authors:  L G Gordon; S M Walker; M C Mervin; A Lowe; D P Smith; R A Gardiner; S K Chambers
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.520

Review 7.  Cost analysis of screening for, diagnosing, and staging prostate cancer based on a systematic review of published studies.

Authors:  Donatus U Ekwueme; Leonardo A Stroud; Yanjing Chen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Cost savings associated with improving appropriate and reducing inappropriate preventive care: cost-consequences analysis.

Authors:  William Hogg; Neill Baskerville; Jacques Lemelin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.