Literature DB >> 7688438

Detection of organ-confined prostate cancer is increased through prostate-specific antigen-based screening.

W J Catalona1, D S Smith, T L Ratliff, J W Basler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening alters the proportion of organ-confined prostate cancers detected.
DESIGN: A prospective, nonrandomized, serial PSA-based screening trial (follow-up from 6 to 37 months), and a concurrent comparison group.
SETTING: General community outpatient screening program based at a university center. PATIENTS: The study group consisted of 10,251 men aged 50 years and older (mean and median age, 63 years; mean and median age of patients who underwent biopsies, 66 years) who presented to a prostate cancer screening program and consented to phlebotomy. The comparison group consisted of 266 concurrently studied private patients in the same age range (mean and median age, 68 years) who were referred for prostatic ultrasonography and biopsy because of an abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion detected with clinically or pathologically advanced prostate cancer.
RESULTS: The men were divided into three groups: the comparison group, the initial PSA-based screening group, and the serial PSA-based screening group. The proportions of prostate cancers detected that were clinically or pathologically advanced were as follows: comparison group, 57% (27/47); initial PSA-based screening group, 37% (91/244); and serial PSA-based screening group, 29% (37/129). Screened patients had a lower proportion of advanced cancers than the comparison group (chi 2 [2] = 12.3; P = .002); this advantage was observed principally in patients younger than 70 years. Surgical staging revealed that the cancer was microscopically focal and well differentiated (possibly latent cancer) in 2.5% (1/40) of the nonscreened group, 2.9% (7/244) of the initially screened group, and 7.8% (10/129) of the serially screened group (generalized Fisher's Exact Test, P = .08).
CONCLUSION: Screening based on PSA identifies some men with prostate cancer who have a significantly increased proportion of organ-confined tumors compared with those detected through evaluation for an abnormal DRE alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7688438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  116 in total

1.  Psychological and screening profiles of first-degree relatives of prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  S M Miller; M A Diefenbach; L K Kruus; D Watkins-Bruner; G E Hanks; P F Engstrom
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2001-06

2.  Prostate cancer screening: Attitudes and practices of family physicians in Ontario.

Authors:  Christopher B Allard; Shawn Dason; Janis Lusis; Anil Kapoor
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Robotic prostate biopsy and its relevance to focal therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Henry Ho; John S P Yuen; Christopher W S Cheng
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  The role of prostate specific antigen in screening and management of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Khurshid Guru; Ashutosh Tewari; Ashok K Hemal; John Wei; Javid Javidan; James Peabody; Mani Menon
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Risk factors for prostate cancer detection after a negative biopsy: a novel multivariable longitudinal approach.

Authors:  Peter H Gann; Angela Fought; Ryan Deaton; William J Catalona; Edward Vonesh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Supraclavicular lymph node: incidence of unsuspected metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Khashayar Hematpour; Carol J Bennett; David Rogers; Christian S Head
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-07-08       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Prostate-specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna P Ankerst
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  VPAC1-targeted PET/CT scan: improved molecular imaging for the diagnosis of prostate cancer using a novel cell surface antigen.

Authors:  Hong Truong; Leonard G Gomella; Mathew L Thakur; Edouard J Trabulsi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Prostate cancer screening (United States).

Authors:  J W Waterbor; A J Bueschen
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Rational approach to implementation of prostate cancer antigen 3 into clinical care.

Authors:  Rou Wang; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Rodney L Dunn; Kirk J Wojno; John T Wei
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.