Literature DB >> 26366237

Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)-Based Population Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Economic Analysis.

A Tawfik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test has become widely used in Canada to test for prostate cancer (PC), the most common cancer among Canadian men. Data suggest that population-based PSA screening may not improve overall survival.
OBJECTIVES: This analysis aimed to review existing economic evaluations of population-based PSA screening, determine current spending on opportunistic PSA screening in Ontario, and estimate the cost of introducing a population-based PSA screening program in the province.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify economic evaluations of population-based PSA screening strategies published from 1998 to 2013. Studies were assessed for their methodological quality and applicability to the Ontario setting. An original cost analysis was also performed, using data from Ontario administrative sources and from the published literature. One-year costs were estimated for 4 strategies: no screening, current (opportunistic) screening of men aged 40 years and older, current (opportunistic) screening of men aged 50 to 74 years, and population-based screening of men aged 50 to 74 years. The analysis was conducted from the payer perspective.
RESULTS: The literature review demonstrated that, overall, population-based PSA screening is costly and cost-ineffective but may be cost-effective in specific populations. Only 1 Canadian study, published 15 years ago, was identified. Approximately $119.2 million is being spent annually on PSA screening of men aged 40 years and older in Ontario, including close to $22 million to screen men younger than 50 and older than 74 years of age (i.e., outside the target age range for a population-based program). A population-based screening program in Ontario would cost approximately $149.4 million in the first year. LIMITATIONS: Estimates were based on the synthesis of data from a variety of sources, requiring several assumptions and causing uncertainty in the results. For example, where Ontario-specific data were unavailable, data from the United States were used.
CONCLUSIONS: PSA screening is associated with significant costs to the health care system when the cost of the PSA test itself is considered in addition to the costs of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of screen-detected PCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26366237      PMCID: PMC4561765     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser        ISSN: 1915-7398


  34 in total

1.  Trends in treatment costs for localized prostate cancer: the healthy screenee effect.

Authors:  Steven B Zeliadt; Ruth Etzioni; Scott D Ramsey; David F Penson; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Prostate Cancer Screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial: findings from the initial screening round of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; David L Levin; E David Crawford; Edward P Gelmann; Paul F Pinsky; David Chia; Barnett S Kramer; Douglas Reding; Timothy R Church; Robert L Grubb; Grant Izmirlian; Lawrence R Ragard; Jonathan D Clapp; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  How does initial treatment choice affect short-term and long-term costs for clinically localized prostate cancer?

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Kevin D Frick; Amanda L Blackford; Robert J Herbert; Bridget A Neville; Michael A Carducci; Craig C Earle
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Cost-benefit analysis of total, free/total, and complexed prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Lars Ellison; Carol D Cheli; Steven Bright; Robert W Veltri; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Prostate cancer screening strategies with re-screening interval determined by individual baseline prostate-specific antigen values are cost-effective.

Authors:  T Kobayashi; R Goto; K Ito; K Mitsumori
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Alvaro Páez; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Sigrid Carlsson; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Paula M Kujala; Bert G Blijenberg; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Andreas Huber; Kimmo Taari; Matti Hakama; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Impact of prostate cancer testing: an evaluation of the emotional consequences of a negative biopsy result.

Authors:  R C Macefield; C Metcalfe; J A Lane; J L Donovan; K N L Avery; J M Blazeby; L Down; D E Neal; F C Hamdy; K Vedhara
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Preferences of husbands and wives for outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment.

Authors:  Robert J Volk; Scott B Cantor; Alvah R Cass; Stephen J Spann; Susan C Weller; Murray D Krahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Anxiety associated with prostate cancer screening with special reference to men with a positive screening test (elevated PSA) - Results from a prospective, population-based, randomised study.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Gunnar Aus; Catrin Wessman; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  The economic and workload impact of 'backdoor' prostate-specific antigen screening on the UK National Health Service: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  Arputharaj J Chelladurai; Thiru Gunendran; Caroline Nicholson; Shyam S Matanhelia; Rosemary A Blades
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Digital Rectal Examination for Prostate Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Leen Naji; Harkanwal Randhawa; Zahra Sohani; Brittany Dennis; Deanna Lautenbach; Owen Kavanagh; Monica Bawor; Laura Banfield; Jason Profetto
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 2.  Prolaris Cell Cycle Progression Test for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-05-01

3.  Sexual and reproductive healthcare needs of Iranian men: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mojgan Javadnoori; Marjan Hajizadeh; Nahid Javadifar; Mohammad Hossein Haghighizadeh
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2018-01-28

4.  Expression of the SIBLINGs and their MMP partners in human benign and malignant prostate neoplasms.

Authors:  Charles C Anunobi; Komal Koli; Geetu Saxena; Adekunbiola A Banjo; Kalu U E Ogbureke
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-26

Review 5.  Lineage plasticity-mediated therapy resistance in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alexandra M Blee; Haojie Huang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Epidemiological and Economic Evaluation of a Pilot Prostate Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Dariga S Smailova; Elisa Fabbro; Serik E Ibrayev; Luca Brusati; Yuliya M Semenova; Umutzhan S Samarova; Farida S Rakhimzhanova; Sabit M Zhussupov; Zaituna A Khismetova; Hengameh Hosseini
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2020-01-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.