Literature DB >> 18030473

Screening for bladder cancer: a perspective.

Yair Lotan1, Robert S Svatek, Núria Malats.   

Abstract

Bladder cancer is the seventh most common cancer worldwide in men and the 17th in women with an overall number of 356,000 new cases of urinary bladder cancer worldwide in 2002. It is one of the most expensive cancers from diagnosis to death and the fifth most expensive cancer in terms of total medical care expenditures in the US. A screening program that resulted in detection of bladder cancer at an earlier stage, prior to muscle invasion or metastasis, could render a significant improvement in patient morbidity and overall survival. Acceptance of wide-spread screening strategies requires careful consideration of the competing risks, benefits, and costs associated with such policies. In this article, we will review the pros and cons of bladder cancer screening with a focus on cost-effectiveness and who should be screened.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18030473     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-007-0223-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  30 in total

1.  Detection of bladder cancer using a point-of-care proteomic assay.

Authors:  H Barton Grossman; Edward Messing; Mark Soloway; Kevin Tomera; Giora Katz; Yitzhak Berger; Yu Shen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Long-term outcome of hematuria home screening for bladder cancer in men.

Authors:  Edward M Messing; Ralph Madeb; Terry Young; Kennedy W Gilchrist; Lora Bram; E Barry Greenberg; John D Wegenke; Laura Stephenson; Jason Gee; Changyong Feng
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Global cancer statistics, 2002.

Authors:  D Max Parkin; Freddie Bray; J Ferlay; Paola Pisani
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 4.  Epidemiology of bladder cancer.

Authors:  D T Silverman; P Hartge; A S Morrison; S S Devesa
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.722

5.  Cost-effectiveness of whole-body CT screening.

Authors:  Molly T Beinfeld; Eve Wittenberg; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Should we screen for bladder cancer in a high-risk population?: A cost per life-year saved analysis.

Authors:  Yair Lotan; Robert S Svatek; Arthur I Sagalowsky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Bladder tumours detected on screening: results at 7 years.

Authors:  M P Mayfield; P Whelan
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1998-12

8.  A quantitative analysis of the costs and benefits of prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  R M Benoit; H Grönberg; M J Naslund
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 9.  Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Hematuria home screening: repeat testing results.

Authors:  E M Messing; T B Young; V B Hunt; M A Newton; L L Bram; A Vaillancourt; W J Hisgen; E B Greenberg; M E Kuglitsch; J D Wegenke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  8 in total

1.  Prognostic impact of non-adherence to follow-up cystoscopy in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

Authors:  Jean Carlo F Datovo; Wilmar Azal Neto; Gustavo B Mendonça; Danilo L Andrade; Leonardo O Reis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Using urine microscopy and cytology for early detection of bladder cancer in male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Eddie S Y Chan; Chi-Fai Ng; See-Ming Hou; Sidney K H Yip
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Genetic susceptibility to distinct bladder cancer subphenotypes.

Authors:  Lin T Guey; Montserrat García-Closas; Cristiane Murta-Nascimento; Josep Lloreta; Laia Palencia; Manolis Kogevinas; Nathaniel Rothman; Gemma Vellalta; M Luz Calle; Gaëlle Marenne; Adonina Tardón; Alfredo Carrato; Reina García-Closas; Consol Serra; Debra T Silverman; Stephen Chanock; Francisco X Real; Núria Malats
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Review of the Clinical Approaches to the Use of Urine-based Tumor Markers in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Timothy Clinton; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2017-10-16

Review 5.  Proteomic research and diagnosis in bladder cancer: state of the art review.

Authors:  Jorge Luis Wilson; Mariana Pereira Antoniassi; Paula Intasqui Lopes; Hatylas Azevedo
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 6.  Microsatellite Instability Analysis (MSA) for Bladder Cancer: Past History and Future Directions.

Authors:  Chulso Moon; Maxie Gordon; David Moon; Thomas Reynolds
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  LINE-1 methylation in leukocyte DNA, interaction with phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase variants and bladder cancer risk.

Authors:  S M Tajuddin; A F S Amaral; A F Fernández; S Chanock; D T Silverman; A Tardón; A Carrato; M García-Closas; B P Jackson; E G Toraño; M Márquez; R G Urdinguio; R García-Closas; N Rothman; M Kogevinas; F X Real; M F Fraga; N Malats
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  ODF4, MAGEA3, and MAGEB4: Potential Biomarkers in Patients with Transitional Cell Carcinoma

Authors:  Mandana Afsharpad; Mohammad Reza Nowroozi; Mohsen Ayati; Mojtaba Saffari; Saeed Nemati; Elham Mohebbi; Leila Nekoohesh; Kazem Zendehdel; Mohammad Hossein Modarressi
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2017-09-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.