Literature DB >> 9933793

A review of the complications and results of implantation of the AMS artificial urinary sphincter.

C A Hajivassiliou1.   

Abstract

The history and evolution of devices designed to achieve urinary continence are reviewed. Passive and active (including volume and pressure regulated) devices are described in detail. Meta-analysis of the published studies revealed that continence improved in 88% of patients and total continence was achieved in 73%. Global revision rate was 32%. Urethral erosion occurred in approximately 12%, infection in 4.5% and mechanical complications in 14% of cases. The complications relating to the AMS artificial urinary sphincter are analyzed. The majority of patients (> 85%) required only one revision. 22% of complications were due to mechanical malfunction. Infection comprised 12.9% of complications. The patterns of total revisions followed a double exponential decay curve: 50% of revisions were performed within 8 months and 90% within 3 years of implantation. Complications were still reported several years postimplantation. This review analyzes the problems relating to the application of pressure and the presence of foreign material around the urethra and exemplifies the requirement for long-term specialist follow-up of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9933793     DOI: 10.1159/000019817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  17 in total

1.  The artificial urinary sphincter is the treatment of choice for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  The possibility of muscle tissue reconstruction using shape memory alloys.

Authors:  Yun Luo; Masaru Higa; Shintaro Amae; Tomoyuki Yambe; Takeshi Okuyama; Toshiyuki Takagi; Hidetoshi Matsuki
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 3.  Incontinence after radical prostatectomy: Anything new in its management?

Authors:  Romain Caremel; Jacques Corcos
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Evaluation and surgical management of intrinsic sphincter deficiency after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Brian J Flynn; George D Webster
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

5.  Indications for revision of artificial urinary sphincter and modifiable risk factors for device-related morbidity.

Authors:  Ifeanyichukwu I Anusionwu; E James Wright
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 2.696

6.  [Sphincter and corpus cavernosum prostheses as components of endoprosthetics in urology].

Authors:  T A Ludwig; R Dahlem
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  [Dysfunctions of artificial urinary sphincters (AMS 800) and their management via a transscrotal access. Optimum procedure illustrated by reference to clinical examples].

Authors:  C van der Horst; C M Naumann; S K Wilson; B Wefer; P M Braun; K P Jünemann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Dorsolateral fibromuscular tissue preservation during artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement is associated with low infection and erosion rates.

Authors:  Felix Cheung; Ali Fathollahi; Emily Vertosick; Thomas R Jarvis; Darren Katz; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 9.  [Künstliche Harnsphincter zur Behandlung von Stress-Harninkontinenz - eine oft nicht ausgelastete Behandlungsoption in Deutschland].

Authors:  R Abdunnur; A Kaufmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  The current role of the artificial urinary sphincter in male and female urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Mar Islah; Sung Yong Cho; Hwancheol Son
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 5.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.