Literature DB >> 28858331

Managing high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and atypical glands on prostate biopsy.

Jeffrey J Tosoian1, Ridwan Alam1, Mark W Ball1, H Ballentine Carter1, Jonathan I Epstein2.   

Abstract

Prostate biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing prostate cancer and reliable pathological assessment is essential for guiding management. Research efforts over the past few years have aimed to establish a more universal approach to management according to pathological grading; however, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and atypical glands suspicious for carcinoma are two diagnoses without standardized follow-up and treatment pathways. Much of this uncertainty is due to limited evidence describing the subsequent rates of cancer and high-grade cancer when HGPIN or atypical glands are detected on initial biopsy. Fortunately, data from the past decade have shed light on these phenomena, and an improved understanding of the implications of the presence of HGPIN and atypical glands on prostate biopsy means that clinical recommendations can be made for the management of patients with these diagnoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28858331     DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2017.134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  50 in total

1.  Follow-up of atypical prostate needle biopsies suspicious for cancer.

Authors:  T Y Chan; J I Epstein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Two sequential diagnoses of atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma on prostate biopsy: a follow-up study of 179 cases.

Authors:  Miao Zhang; James B Amberson; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Risk of prostate cancer on first re-biopsy within 1 year following a diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is related to the number of cores sampled.

Authors:  Mehsati Herawi; Hillel Kahane; Christina Cavallo; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Prostate Health Index density improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Sasha C Druskin; Darian Andreas; Patrick Mullane; Meera Chappidi; Sarah Joo; Kamyar Ghabili; Mufaddal Mamawala; Joseph Agostino; Herbert B Carter; Alan W Partin; Lori J Sokoll; Ashley E Ross
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 5.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; H Ballentine Carter; Abbey Lepor; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; Lars Egevad; Mahul B Amin; Brett Delahunt; John R Srigley; Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Is low-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia a risk factor for cancer?

Authors:  L Goeman; S Joniau; D Ponette; F Van der Aa; T Roskams; R Oyen; H Van Poppel
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  Significance of atypical and suspicious small acinar proliferations, and high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate biopsy: implications for cancer detection and biopsy strategy.

Authors:  Christopher R Girasole; Michael S Cookson; Mathew J Putzi; Sam S Chang; Joseph A Smith; Nancy Wells; Jonathan R Oppenheimer; Scott B Shappell
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Risk of prostate cancer after detection of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) on extended core needle biopsy: a UK hospital experience.

Authors:  Paras B Singh; Caroline M Nicholson; Narasimhan Ragavan; Rosemary A Blades; Francis L Martin; Shyam S Matanhelia
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation: Repeat Biopsy and Detection of High Grade Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Leone; Katherine Rotker; Christi Butler; Anthony Mega; Jianhong Li; Ali Amin; Stephen F Schiff; Gyan Pareek; Dragan Golijanin; Joseph F Renzulli
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2015-09-14
View more
  3 in total

1.  Is Ki67 prognostic for aggressive prostate cancer? A multicenter real-world study.

Authors:  Joseph J Fantony; Lauren E Howard; Ilona Csizmadi; Andrew J Armstrong; Amy L Lark; Colette Galet; William J Aronson; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.851

Review 2.  Clinical implications of PTEN loss in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tamara Jamaspishvili; David M Berman; Ashley E Ross; Howard I Scher; Angelo M De Marzo; Jeremy A Squire; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Current Understanding and Management of Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate.

Authors:  Bryden Considine; Adebowale Adeniran; Michael E Hurwitz
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.075

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.