Literature DB >> 9928787

The time-course of preparatory spinal and cortico-spinal inhibition: an H-reflex and transcranial magnetic stimulation study in man.

T Hasbroucq1, H Kaneko, M Akamatsu, C A Possamaï.   

Abstract

In a previous study where reaction-time methods were combined with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex, cortico-spinal excitability was shown to reflect time preparation. Provided that subjects can accurately estimate time, the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) diminish progressively during the interval separating the warning signal from the response signal (i.e., the foreperiod). On the other hand, several experiments have demonstrated that the amplitude of the Hoffman (H) reflex elicited in prime movers diminishes during the foreperiod of reaction-time tasks. The aim of the present study was to compare the time course of the respective decrements of H-reflex and MEP amplitude during a constant 500-ms foreperiod. The subjects (n=8) participated in two experimental sessions. In one session, H-reflexes were induced in a tonically activated, responding hand muscle, the flexor pollicis brevis, at different times during the foreperiod of a visual-choice reaction-time task. In the other session, motor potentials were evoked in the same muscle by TMS of the motor cortex delivered in the same behavioral conditions and at the same times as in the first session. The results show that both H-reflexes and MEPs diminish in amplitude during the foreperiod, which replicates and extends previous findings. Interestingly, the time constants of the two decrements differed. There was a facilitatory effect of both electrical and magnetic stimulations on the subject's performance: reaction time was shorter for the trials during which a stimulation was delivered than for the no-stimulation trials. This facilitation was maximal when the stimulations were delivered simultaneously with the warning signal and vanished progressively with stimulation time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9928787     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  33 in total

Review 1.  Getting ready to move: transmitted information in the corticospinal pathway during preparation for movement.

Authors:  Oren Cohen; Efrat Sherman; Nofya Zinger; Steve Perlmutter; Yifat Prut
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Corticomotor excitability during a choice-hand reaction time task.

Authors:  Steven McMillan; Richard B Ivry; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Reduced intracortical inhibition during the foreperiod of a warned reaction time task.

Authors:  Craig Sinclair; Geoffrey R Hammond
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Excitatory and inhibitory processes in primary motor cortex during the foreperiod of a warned reaction time task are unrelated to response expectancy.

Authors:  Craig Sinclair; Geoffrey R Hammond
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Role of corticospinal suppression during motor preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Temporal dynamics of motor cortex excitability during perception of natural emotional scenes.

Authors:  Sara Borgomaneri; Valeria Gazzola; Alessio Avenanti
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Motor cortex excitability changes during imagery of simple reaction time.

Authors:  Hatice Kumru; Oscar Soto; Jordi Casanova; Josep Valls-Sole
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Inhibition during response preparation is sensitive to response complexity.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse; Dylan Saks; Timothy Hoang; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Influence of Delay Period Duration on Inhibitory Processes for Response Preparation.

Authors:  Florent Lebon; Ian Greenhouse; Ludovica Labruna; Benjamin Vanderschelden; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing.

Authors:  Bettina Rolke; Peter Hofmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.