Literature DB >> 18074124

Reduced intracortical inhibition during the foreperiod of a warned reaction time task.

Craig Sinclair1, Geoffrey R Hammond.   

Abstract

Reaction time (RT) is shortened when the response signal is preceded by a warning signal, a finding that has been attributed to response preparation during the foreperiod between the warning and response signals. Research suggests an increased excitability of cortical movement representations associated with response preparation during the foreperiod of a warned RT task (Davranche et al. in Eur J Neurosci 25:3766-3774, 2007). However when the foreperiod duration is short and constant, the motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during the foreperiod is suppressed (Touge et al. in Clin Neurophysiol 111:1216-1226, 1998), suggesting a competing inhibitory process. Three experiments measured MEP amplitude and intracortical inhibition during the foreperiod of a warned RT task in which the response was a flexion of the right index finger. Experiments 1 and 2 measured short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) with paired TMS pulses separated by inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) of 3 (SICI(3)) and 1.5 ms (SICI(1.5)), respectively. Experiment 3 measured long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) with paired TMS pulses with an ISI of 100 ms (LICI(100)). In all experiments MEP amplitude was smaller in the warned condition than in the unwarned condition. There was less SICI(3) in the warned condition than in the unwarned condition (Experiment 1) whereas SICI(1.5) was similar in both conditions (Experiment 2). There was less LICI(100) in the warned condition than in the unwarned condition (Experiment 3). The intracortical inhibitory processes measured here cannot explain the suppression of MEP amplitude in the warned condition. We propose that the suppression of MEP amplitude is the result of an inhibitory mechanism, which acts on primary motor cortex to prevent premature response during the foreperiod.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18074124     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1241-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  Interactions between two different inhibitory systems in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  T D Sanger; R R Garg; R Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Symmetric facilitation between motor cortices during contraction of ipsilateral hand muscles.

Authors:  C M Stinear; K S Walker; W D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Preshaping and continuous evolution of motor cortical representations during movement preparation.

Authors:  Annette Bastian; Gregor Schöner; Alexa Riehle
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Macaque ventral premotor cortex exerts powerful facilitation of motor cortex outputs to upper limb motoneurons.

Authors:  H Shimazu; M A Maier; G Cerri; P A Kirkwood; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Two phases of short-interval intracortical inhibition.

Authors:  Lailoma Roshan; Guillermo O Paradiso; Robert Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Cortical mechanisms of unilateral voluntary motor inhibition in humans.

Authors:  Tahamina Begum; Tatsuya Mima; Tatsuhide Oga; Hidemi Hara; Takeshi Satow; Akio Ikeda; Takashi Nagamine; Hidenao Fukuyama; Hiroshi Shibasaki
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 3.304

7.  Warning signals influence motor processing.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement?

Authors:  R S Nickerson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Effects of motor preparation and spatial attention on corticospinal excitability in a delayed-response paradigm.

Authors:  Rogier B Mars; Sven Bestmann; John C Rothwell; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Associative plasticity in human motor cortex during voluntary muscle contraction.

Authors:  Kayoko Kujirai; Takashi Kujirai; Thomas Sinkjaer; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  22 in total

1.  Excitatory and inhibitory processes in primary motor cortex during the foreperiod of a warned reaction time task are unrelated to response expectancy.

Authors:  Craig Sinclair; Geoffrey R Hammond
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Role of corticospinal suppression during motor preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  The effect of test TMS intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition in different excitability states.

Authors:  M I Garry; R H S Thomson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Speed-dependent contribution of callosal pathways to ipsilateral movements.

Authors:  Toshiki Tazoe; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Motor cortex excitability changes during imagery of simple reaction time.

Authors:  Hatice Kumru; Oscar Soto; Jordi Casanova; Josep Valls-Sole
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Inhibition during response preparation is sensitive to response complexity.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse; Dylan Saks; Timothy Hoang; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Influence of Delay Period Duration on Inhibitory Processes for Response Preparation.

Authors:  Florent Lebon; Ian Greenhouse; Ludovica Labruna; Benjamin Vanderschelden; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Age-related differences in corticospinal excitability during a choice reaction time task.

Authors:  Koen Cuypers; Herbert Thijs; Julie Duque; Stephan P Swinnen; Oron Levin; Raf L J Meesen
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2012-09-25

9.  Proactive modulation of long-interval intracortical inhibition during response inhibition.

Authors:  Matthew J Cowie; Hayley J MacDonald; John Cirillo; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Long-term practice of isolated finger movements reduces enslaved response of tonically contracting little finger abductor to tonic index finger abduction.

Authors:  Koichi Hiraoka; Shun Ito; Momoko Lutton; Maya Nakano; Noritaka Yonei
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.