BACKGROUND: Hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics is the standard care for patients with neutropenia and fever. This randomized clinical trial evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of ambulatory care with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk, chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and fever. METHODS:Patients with solid tumors who were treated with conventional dose chemotherapy, presented with fever (axillary temperature >38 degrees C on 2 occasions or >38.5 degrees C on a single occasion) and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, <500 cells/microL), and met low risk criteria were eligible for this study. They were randomized either to hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, which consisted of a combination of cefazidime and amikacin, or to outpatient treatment with oral ofloxacin. The definitions of fever of unknown origin, clinical and microbiologic infection, success, success with modification, and failure were the usual ones for this type of study. RESULTS:One hundred episodes were randomized, and 95 were evaluable (47 were randomized toceftazidime/amikacin and 48 to ofloxacin). Baseline characteristics, as well as the proportion of patients with microbiologic and clinical infections, were similar in the two groups. In 91% of episodes in the inpatient group and 89% in the ofloxacin group, patients recovered uneventfully (P=1; 95% CI for the difference, -0.09 to 0.13), with 2 and 5 patients requiring modification of the antibiotics, respectively. Eight percent of episodes in the control group and 10.4% in the experimental group resulted in treatment failure. Eight patients (16%) in the outpatient group experienced failure with ambulatory care and were admitted to the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient oral antibiotic therapy with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk neutropenia and fever is safe and similar in efficacy to hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotics.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics is the standard care for patients with neutropenia and fever. This randomized clinical trial evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of ambulatory care with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk, chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and fever. METHODS:Patients with solid tumors who were treated with conventional dose chemotherapy, presented with fever (axillary temperature >38 degrees C on 2 occasions or >38.5 degrees C on a single occasion) and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, <500 cells/microL), and met low risk criteria were eligible for this study. They were randomized either to hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, which consisted of a combination of cefazidime and amikacin, or to outpatient treatment with oral ofloxacin. The definitions of fever of unknown origin, clinical and microbiologic infection, success, success with modification, and failure were the usual ones for this type of study. RESULTS: One hundred episodes were randomized, and 95 were evaluable (47 were randomized to ceftazidime/amikacin and 48 to ofloxacin). Baseline characteristics, as well as the proportion of patients with microbiologic and clinical infections, were similar in the two groups. In 91% of episodes in the inpatient group and 89% in the ofloxacin group, patients recovered uneventfully (P=1; 95% CI for the difference, -0.09 to 0.13), with 2 and 5 patients requiring modification of the antibiotics, respectively. Eight percent of episodes in the control group and 10.4% in the experimental group resulted in treatment failure. Eight patients (16%) in the outpatient group experienced failure with ambulatory care and were admitted to the hospital. CONCLUSIONS:Outpatient oral antibiotic therapy with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk neutropenia and fever is safe and similar in efficacy to hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotics.
Authors: James A Talcott; Beow Y Yeap; Jack A Clark; Robert D Siegel; Elizabeth Trice Loggers; Charles Lu; Paul A Godley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Jimeno; A Arcediano; S Bazares; M L Amador; L González-Cortijo; E Ciruelos; L Robles; D Castellano; L Paz-Ares; C Lumbreras; J Hornedo; H Cortés-Funes Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Oliver A Cornely; Thomas Wicke; Harald Seifert; Ullrich Bethe; Martin Schwonzen; Dietmar Reichert; Andrew J Ullmann; Meinolf Karthaus; Kai Breuer; Bernd Salzberger; Volker Diehl; Gerd Fätkenheuer Journal: Int J Hematol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 2.490
Authors: Carmen P Escalante; Mary Ann Weiser; Ellen Manzullo; Robert Benjamin; Edgardo Rivera; Tony Lam; Vi Ho; Rosalie Valdres; Eva Lu Lee; Noemi Badrina; Sally Fernandez; Yvette DeJesus; Kenneth Rolston Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Catherine Sebban; Sophie Dussart; Christine Fuhrmann; Hervé Ghesquieres; Isabelle Rodrigues; Lionel Geoffrois; Yves Devaux; Laurence Lancry; Giselle Chvetzoff; Thomas Bachelot; Maria Chelghoum; Pierre Biron Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 3.603