BACKGROUND: We treated low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients utilizing two standard outpatient antibiotic pathways: oral ampicillin/clavulanate (500 mg) and ciprofloxacin (500 mg) or intravenous ceftazidime (2 g) and clindamycin (600 mg) every 8 h. The objectives were to determine the success of outpatient treatment of low-risk febrile neutropenia, to identify factors predicting outpatient failure, and to determine mortality related to the febrile episode. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included solid tumor diagnosis, stable vital signs, temperature > or =38.0 degrees C, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of <1000/ml, patient compliance, no significant organ dysfunction, ability to tolerate oral medication and fluids for oral pathway, residence within 30 miles of the institution, 24-h caregiver, and telephone and transportation access. RESULTS: There were 257 febrile episodes in 191 patients meeting the criteria. Patients were treated during March 1998 through February 2000. Median age was 48 (range, 17-77) years, and 60% (n = 153) had an entry ANC of <100/ml; 205 (80%) febrile episodes successfully responded to outpatient treatment, and 52 (20%) were hospitalized. Logistic regression analysis showed the following were related to hospitalization: mucositis >grade 2 (p < 0.002); Zubrod performance status > or =2 (p = 0.029); ANC <100/ml (p = 0.039), and age > or =70 years (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient treatment of low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients utilizing standard treatment pathways is associated with minimal morbidity and mortality and should be considered an acceptable standard of care with appropriate infrastructure available to provide strict and careful follow-up while on treatment. Certain factors are associated with higher risk of hospitalization and should be further examined in eligible patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia.
BACKGROUND: We treated low-risk febrile neutropenic cancerpatients utilizing two standard outpatient antibiotic pathways: oral ampicillin/clavulanate (500 mg) and ciprofloxacin (500 mg) or intravenous ceftazidime (2 g) and clindamycin (600 mg) every 8 h. The objectives were to determine the success of outpatient treatment of low-risk febrile neutropenia, to identify factors predicting outpatient failure, and to determine mortality related to the febrile episode. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included solid tumor diagnosis, stable vital signs, temperature > or =38.0 degrees C, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of <1000/ml, patient compliance, no significant organ dysfunction, ability to tolerate oral medication and fluids for oral pathway, residence within 30 miles of the institution, 24-h caregiver, and telephone and transportation access. RESULTS: There were 257 febrile episodes in 191 patients meeting the criteria. Patients were treated during March 1998 through February 2000. Median age was 48 (range, 17-77) years, and 60% (n = 153) had an entry ANC of <100/ml; 205 (80%) febrile episodes successfully responded to outpatient treatment, and 52 (20%) were hospitalized. Logistic regression analysis showed the following were related to hospitalization: mucositis >grade 2 (p < 0.002); Zubrod performance status > or =2 (p = 0.029); ANC <100/ml (p = 0.039), and age > or =70 years (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS:Outpatient treatment of low-risk febrile neutropenic cancerpatients utilizing standard treatment pathways is associated with minimal morbidity and mortality and should be considered an acceptable standard of care with appropriate infrastructure available to provide strict and careful follow-up while on treatment. Certain factors are associated with higher risk of hospitalization and should be further examined in eligible patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia.
Authors: Walter T Hughes; Donald Armstrong; Gerald P Bodey; Eric J Bow; Arthur E Brown; Thierry Calandra; Ronald Feld; Philip A Pizzo; Kenneth V I Rolston; Jerry L Shenep; Lowell S Young Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2002-02-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: G P Bodey; V Fainstein; L S Elting; E Anaissie; K Rolston; N Khardori; H Kantarjian; C Plager; W K Murphy; F Holmes Journal: Cancer Date: 1990-01-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: E B Rubenstein; K Rolston; R S Benjamin; J Loewy; C Escalante; E Manzullo; P Hughes; B Moreland; A Fender; K Kennedy Journal: Cancer Date: 1993-06-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: K V Rolston; P Berkey; G P Bodey; E J Anaissie; N M Khardori; J H Joshi; M J Keating; F A Holmes; F F Cabanillas; L Elting Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 1992-02
Authors: M Hidalgo; J Hornedo; C Lumbreras; J M Trigo; R Colomer; S Perea; C Gómez; A Ruiz; R García-Carbonero; H Cortés-Funes Journal: Cancer Date: 1999-01-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Nalini Tarakeshwar; Lauren C Vanderwerker; Elizabeth Paulk; Michelle J Pearce; Stanislav V Kasl; Holly G Prigerson Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Lauren C Vanderwerker; Susan D Block; Baohui Zhang; Holly G Prigerson Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kenneth V I Rolston; Susan E Frisbee-Hume; Shreyaskumar Patel; Ellen F Manzullo; Robert S Benjamin Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Luciano de Souza Viana; José Carlos Serufo; Manoel Otávio da Costa Rocha; Renato Nogueira Costa; Roberto Carlos Duarte Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2007-10-25 Impact factor: 3.603