GOALS OF WORK: Patients with low-risk neutropenic fever as defined by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score might benefit from ambulatory treatment. Optimal management remains to be clearly defined, and new oral antibiotics need to be evaluated in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cancer patients with febrile neutropenia and a favorable MASCC score were randomized between oral moxifloxacin and intravenous ceftriaxone. All were fit for early hospital discharge. The global success rate was related to the efficacy of monotherapy, as well as to the success of ambulatory monitoring. MAIN RESULTS: The trial was closed prematurely because of low accrual. Ninety-six patients were included (47 in the ceftriaxone arm and 49 in the moxifloxacin arm). A total of 65% were women, 30.2% had lymphoma, 34.4% had metastatic, and 35.4% had non-metastatic solid tumors. The success rates of home antibiotics were 73.9% and 79.2% for ceftriaxone and moxifloxacin, respectively. Seven patients were not discharged, and 14 required re-hospitalization. There were 17% of microbiologically documented infections that were, in most cases, susceptible to oral monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that MASCC is a valid and useful tool to select patients for ambulatory treatments and that oral moxifloxacin monotherapy is safe and effective for the outpatient treatment of cancer patients with low-risk neutropenic fever.
RCT Entities:
GOALS OF WORK: Patients with low-risk neutropenic fever as defined by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score might benefit from ambulatory treatment. Optimal management remains to be clearly defined, and new oral antibiotics need to be evaluated in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Cancerpatients with febrile neutropenia and a favorable MASCC score were randomized between oral moxifloxacin and intravenous ceftriaxone. All were fit for early hospital discharge. The global success rate was related to the efficacy of monotherapy, as well as to the success of ambulatory monitoring. MAIN RESULTS: The trial was closed prematurely because of low accrual. Ninety-six patients were included (47 in the ceftriaxone arm and 49 in the moxifloxacin arm). A total of 65% were women, 30.2% had lymphoma, 34.4% had metastatic, and 35.4% had non-metastatic solid tumors. The success rates of home antibiotics were 73.9% and 79.2% for ceftriaxone and moxifloxacin, respectively. Seven patients were not discharged, and 14 required re-hospitalization. There were 17% of microbiologically documented infections that were, in most cases, susceptible to oral monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that MASCC is a valid and useful tool to select patients for ambulatory treatments and that oral moxifloxacin monotherapy is safe and effective for the outpatient treatment of cancerpatients with low-risk neutropenic fever.
Authors: Walter T Hughes; Donald Armstrong; Gerald P Bodey; Eric J Bow; Arthur E Brown; Thierry Calandra; Ronald Feld; Philip A Pizzo; Kenneth V I Rolston; Jerry L Shenep; Lowell S Young Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2002-02-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: A Freifeld; D Marchigiani; T Walsh; S Chanock; L Lewis; J Hiemenz; S Hiemenz; J E Hicks; V Gill; S M Steinberg; P A Pizzo Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-07-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J Klastersky; M Paesmans; E B Rubenstein; M Boyer; L Elting; R Feld; J Gallagher; J Herrstedt; B Rapoport; K Rolston; J Talcott Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carmen P Escalante; Mary Ann Weiser; Ellen Manzullo; Robert Benjamin; Edgardo Rivera; Tony Lam; Vi Ho; Rosalie Valdres; Eva Lu Lee; Noemi Badrina; Sally Fernandez; Yvette DeJesus; Kenneth Rolston Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: P Biron; C Fuhrmann; H Cure; P Viens; D Lefebvre; A Thyss; M Viot; P Soler-Michel; C Rollin; J J Grès Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Young Eun Ha; Jae-Hoon Song; Won Ki Kang; Kyong Ran Peck; Doo Ryeon Chung; Cheol-In Kang; Mi-Kyong Joung; Eun-Jeong Joo; Kyung Mok Shon Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: O Teuffel; S Cheng; M C Ethier; C Diorio; J Martino; C Mayo; R Wing; L Sung; S M H Alibhai Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Fiona Lim Mei Ying; Maria Choy Yin Ping; Macy Tong; Elaine Yim Pik Yan; Tracy Lui Siu Yee; Lam Yuk Ting; Anita Lo Wing Sim; Lui Cheuk Yu; Bosco Lam Hoi Shiu; Ashley Cheng Chi Kin Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kenneth V I Rolston; Susan E Frisbee-Hume; Shreyaskumar Patel; Ellen F Manzullo; Robert S Benjamin Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 3.603