Literature DB >> 12678567

Outpatient therapy for febrile neutropenia: clinical and economic implications.

Fausto de Lalla1.   

Abstract

Although febrile episodes in neutropenic patients remain a potentially life-threatening complication of anticancer chemotherapy, considerable progress has been achieved in understanding this issue. Febrile neutropenic patients represent a heterogeneous population that displays a very variable risk for serious medical complications. It has also been ascertained that in low-risk patients, the standard of care can be safely and effectively shifted from traditional hospital-based, parenteral, empiric, broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy to outpatient treatment, even for the entire duration of the febrile episode. Furthermore, in the last years some risk assessment models have been developed to identify, at the onset of febrile episodes, low-risk neutropenic patients who are most likely to have a favourable outcome (and who can effectively and safely be treated on an outpatient basis). With respect to traditional hospital-based therapy, the outpatient treatment of low-risk patients is associated with several advantages, including a conspicuous cost saving. Some strategies for inpatient therapy, such as switching from intravenous to oral antibacterials and early discharge, can allow some cost containment; however, the most substantial decrease in costs can be obtained by using outpatient treatment over the entire febrile episode, especially by using oral antibacterials. In spite of the considerable number of clinical studies published over the past 20 years, only limited pharmacoeconomic data on this issue are available. Future comparative studies between outpatient and inpatient treatment of febrile neutropenia, in addition to clinical outcomes (e.g. survival, time to clinical response), should therefore include the following: (i) a detailed analysis of total costs, specifying the setting of outpatient treatment and the method of administration of antimicrobial agents (home nursing, self administration or treatment at infusion centres or at a low-care unit of the hospital); (ii) cost of inpatient treatment if outpatient therapy fails; and (iii) out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12678567     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200321060-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  49 in total

1.  A double-blind comparison of empirical oral and intravenous antibiotic therapy for low-risk febrile patients with neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  A Freifeld; D Marchigiani; T Walsh; S Chanock; L Lewis; J Hiemenz; S Hiemenz; J E Hicks; V Gill; S M Steinberg; P A Pizzo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Practice guidelines for community-based parenteral anti-infective therapy. ISDA Practice Guidelines Committee.

Authors:  D N Williams; S J Rehm; A D Tice; J S Bradley; A C Kind; W A Craig
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Stepdown single agent antibiotic therapy for the management of the high risk neutropenic adult with hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  H W Horowitz; D Holmgren; K Seiter
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  1996-09

4.  The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index: A multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients.

Authors:  J Klastersky; M Paesmans; E B Rubenstein; M Boyer; L Elting; R Feld; J Gallagher; J Herrstedt; B Rapoport; K Rolston; J Talcott
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Antibiotic treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients. Clinical and economic considerations.

Authors:  F de Lalla
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Outpatient treatment of febrile episodes in low-risk neutropenic patients with cancer.

Authors:  E B Rubenstein; K Rolston; R S Benjamin; J Loewy; C Escalante; E Manzullo; P Hughes; B Moreland; A Fender; K Kennedy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Home antibiotic therapy for low-risk cancer patients with fever and neutropenia: a pilot study of 30 patients based on a validated prediction rule.

Authors:  J A Talcott; A Whalen; J Clark; P P Rieker; R Finberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  The evolution of the empirical management of fever and neutropenia in cancer patients.

Authors:  C Viscoli
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Evaluation of a home intravenous antibiotic program in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  J T Wiernikowski; M Rothney; S Dawson; M Andrew
Journal:  Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  1991

10.  The identification of febrile, neutropenic children with neoplastic disease at low risk for bacteremia and complications of sepsis.

Authors:  K G Lucas; A E Brown; D Armstrong; D Chapman; G Heller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial treatment of febrile neutropenia: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  Tiphaine Goulenok; Bruno Fantin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Febrile neutropenia studies in Brazil - treatment and cost management based on analyses of cases.

Authors:  Marcelo Bellesso
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2013
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.