Literature DB >> 9921836

Effect of chemical cleaning agents and commercial sanitizers on ATP bioluminescence measurements.

T A Green1, S M Russell, D L Fletcher.   

Abstract

Nine chemical cleaning agents at three concentrations were studied to determine the effect on ATP bioluminescence measurements from pure ATP (PATP) and ATP from chicken exudate (CJATP). The nine commercial cleaning and sanitizing chemicals were concentrated foaming acid (FA), acid sanitizer (AS), iodine cleaner-disinfectant (ZI), alkaline cleaner-degreaser (PC), chlorinated alkaline cleaner (CA), chlorinated sanitizer (CS), quaternary ammonium (QA), antibiofilm agent (AB), and acidic peroxygen sanitizer (HP). Effect was reported as a percent change from the log10 relative light unit (LRLU) measurements of the control groups. All cleaners and sanitizers were tested at one-tenth of the manufacturer's recommended level (MRL), MRL, and two times MRL. FA, PC, and CA at all three concentrations significantly decreased PATP and CJATP LRLU. AS decreased PATP and CJATP LRLU at 200 and 400 ppm quaternary ammonium. ZI decreased PATP LRLU at MRL or greater, while CJATP LRLU were decreased by all concentrations of ZI tested. CS decreased PATP LRLU in a dose-dependent manner; however, for CJATP, LRLU decreased slightly at the two lower concentrations but were not affected by 1,200 ppm CS. QA at MRL or above for PATP or at all concentrations for CJATP significantly increased LRLU. AB decreased LRLU at all concentrations tested for PATP or at MRL or greater for CJATP. HPA at MRL or greater for PATP or at all concentrations for CJATP significantly reduced LRLU. These results demonstrate that commercial sanitizers and cleansers may squelch or increase LRLU measurements when the chemical comes into direct contact with the ATP bioluminescence reagents. Hence, when using ATP bioluminescence as a means of determining sanitary quality of food-processing equipment, it is essential to consider the type and concentration of chemical cleaner or sanitizer being used on the equipment prior to testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9921836     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-62.1.86

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  10 in total

1.  Efficacy and limitations of an ATP-based monitoring system.

Authors:  Danielle E Turner; Erin K Daugherity; Craig Altier; Kirk J Maurer
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Individual training for farmers based on results from protein and ATP rapid tests and microbiological conventional cultural methods improves hygiene in pig fattening pens.

Authors:  Céline Heinemann; Isabell Meyer; Franziska T Bögel; Simone M Schmid; Jason J Hayer; Julia Steinhoff-Wagner
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Assessing Accumulation of Organic Material on Rodent Cage Accessories.

Authors:  Kenneth P Allen; Tarrant J Csida; Joseph D Thulin
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Use of ATP Readings to Predict a Successful Hygiene Intervention in the Workplace to Reduce the Spread of Viruses on Fomites.

Authors:  Laura Y Sifuentes; Sonia L M Fankem; Kelly Reynolds; Akrum H Tamimi; Charles P Gerba; David Koenig
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  What Orthopaedic Operating Room Surfaces Are Contaminated With Bioburden? A Study Using the ATP Bioluminescence Assay.

Authors:  Raveesh Daniel Richard; Thomas R Bowen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Can measuring environmental cleanliness using ATP aid in the monitoring of wards with periods of increased incidence of Clostridium difficile?

Authors:  Katherine Hardy; Gill Abbott; Sarah Bashford; Helen Bucior; Jane Codd; Madelaine Holland; Mandy Reynolds; Avril Simms; Diane Thomlinson
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2013-08-23

7.  Adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay for monitoring contamination of the working environment of anaesthetists and cleanliness of the operating room.

Authors:  Tomoko Fukada; Yuri Tsuchiya; Hiroko Iwakiri; Makoto Ozaki
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2014-11-13

8.  Assessment of percent positive agreement between fluorescent marker and ATPase for environmental cleaning monitoring during sequential application in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jason P Burnham; Emily R Shives; David K Warren; Jennifer H Han; Hilary M Babcock
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 2.918

9.  Evaluation of Rodent Cage Processing Using Reduced Water Temperatures.

Authors:  Mary M Walker; Dianne M Harrison; Toi A Collins; Valerie K Bergdall
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 1.706

10.  How reliable are ATP bioluminescence meters in assessing decontamination of environmental surfaces in healthcare settings?

Authors:  Navid Omidbakhsh; Faraz Ahmadpour; Nicole Kenny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.