Literature DB >> 31875908

Individual training for farmers based on results from protein and ATP rapid tests and microbiological conventional cultural methods improves hygiene in pig fattening pens.

Céline Heinemann1, Isabell Meyer2, Franziska T Bögel1, Simone M Schmid1, Jason J Hayer1, Julia Steinhoff-Wagner1.   

Abstract

Optimal hygiene management is an essential part of maintaining a high standard of health in conventional pig production systems and for the successful interruption of infection chains. Currently, efficiency assessments on cleaning and disinfection are only performed by visual inspection or are neglected completely. The aim of this study was to evaluate the available methods for on farm monitoring of hygiene, identify critical points in pig pens and use the data obtained for training purposes. In addition to visual inspection by assessing the cleanliness, microbiological swab samples, i.e., aerobic total viable count (TVC), total coliform count, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and extended-spectrum β-lactamases-producing bacteria (ESBL), swab samples for ATP as well as protein residues and agar contact plates combined with 3 different culture media, were applied and ranked according to their suitability for livestock farming. Samples were collected on at least 15 critical points from one representative pen on 6 pig fattening farms with various hygiene management practices after cleaning and disinfection. After the first sampling, farmers were trained with their individual results, and sampling was repeated 6 mo after training. Nipple drinkers, feeding tubes (external and inner surface), and troughs (external and inner surface) showed the greatest bacterial loads (TVC: 4.5-6.7 log10 cfu cm-2) and values for ATP and protein residues; therefore, these surfaces could be identified as the most important critical points. Spearman rank correlations (P < 0.01) were found between the different assessment methods, especially for the TVC and ATP (r = 0.82, P < 0.001). For rapid assessment on farms, ATP tests represented an accurate and cost-efficient alternative to microbiological techniques. Training improved cleaning performance as indicated by a lower rating for visual inspection, TVC, ATP, MRSA, and ESBL in the second assessment. The monitoring of cleaning efficiency in pig pens followed by training of the staff constitutes a valuable strategy to limit the spread of infectious diseases and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Special attention should be paid to the sufficient hygiene of drinkers and feeders.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal health; cleaning; disease prevention; disinfection; method evaluation; pork production

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31875908      PMCID: PMC6978896          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  18 in total

1.  Risk factors for Salmonella persistence after cleansing and disinfection in French broiler-chicken houses.

Authors:  N Rose; F Beaudeau; P Drouin; J Y Toux; V Rose; P Colin
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2000-03-29       Impact factor: 2.670

2.  Is it really clean? An evaluation of the efficacy of four methods for determining hospital cleanliness.

Authors:  O Sherlock; N O'Connell; E Creamer; H Humphreys
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Assessment of producers' response to Salmonella biosecurity issues and uptake of advice on laying hen farms in England and Wales.

Authors:  R J Gosling; F Martelli; A Wintrip; A R Sayers; K Wheeler; R H Davies
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.095

4.  Comparison of sampling procedures and microbiological and non-microbiological parameters to evaluate cleaning and disinfection in broiler houses.

Authors:  K Luyckx; J Dewulf; S Van Weyenberg; L Herman; J Zoons; E Vervaet; M Heyndrickx; K De Reu
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Evaluation of the hygienogram scores and related data obtained after cleaning and disinfection of poultry houses in Flanders during the period 2007 to 2014.

Authors:  H Maertens; K De Reu; S Van Weyenberg; E Van Coillie; E Meyer; H Van Meirhaeghe; F Van Immerseel; V Vandenbroucke; M Vanrobaeys; J Dewulf
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Longitudinal monitoring of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase/AmpC-producing Escherichia coli at German broiler chicken fattening farms.

Authors:  H Laube; A Friese; C von Salviati; B Guerra; A Käsbohrer; L Kreienbrock; U Roesler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Sanitary housing conditions modify the performance and behavioural response of weaned pigs to feed- and housing-related stressors.

Authors:  H Pastorelli; N Le Floc'h; E Merlot; M C Meunier-Salaün; J van Milgen; L Montagne
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of an environmental cleaning intervention on the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci on surfaces in intensive care unit rooms.

Authors:  Eric R Goodman; Richard Platt; Richard Bass; Andrew B Onderdonk; Deborah S Yokoe; Susan S Huang
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.254

9.  Effect of chemical cleaning agents and commercial sanitizers on ATP bioluminescence measurements.

Authors:  T A Green; S M Russell; D L Fletcher
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.077

10.  Understanding the role of cleaning in the control of Salmonella Typhimurium in grower-finisher pigs: a modelling approach.

Authors:  R Gautam; G Lahodny; M Bani-Yaghoub; P S Morley; R Ivanek
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 4.434

View more
  5 in total

1.  A risk-oriented evaluation of biofilm and other influencing factors on biological quality of drinking water for dairy cows.

Authors:  Jason J Hayer; Céline Heinemann; Benedikt G Schulze-Dieckhoff; Julia Steinhoff-Wagner
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Effect of micro-aerobic process on improvement of anaerobic digestion sewage sludge treatment: flow cytometry and ATP assessment.

Authors:  Reza Barati Rashvanlou; Abbas Rezaee; Mahdi Farzadkia; Mitra Gholami; Majid Kermani
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  Bacteriophage Encapsulation in pH-Responsive Core-Shell Capsules as an Animal Feed Additive.

Authors:  Kerry Richards; Danish J Malik
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  Single Blinded Study on the Feasibility of Decontaminating LA-MRSA in Pig Compartments under Routine Conditions.

Authors:  Iris Kobusch; Hannah Müller; Alexander Mellmann; Robin Köck; Marc Boelhauve
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-26

5.  Effect of different cleaning procedures on water use and bacterial levels in weaner pig pens.

Authors:  Shilpi Misra; Corina E van Middelaar; Kieran Jordan; John Upton; Amy J Quinn; Imke J M de Boer; Keelin O'Driscoll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.