Literature DB >> 31744633

Assessment of percent positive agreement between fluorescent marker and ATPase for environmental cleaning monitoring during sequential application in an intensive care unit.

Jason P Burnham1, Emily R Shives2, David K Warren3, Jennifer H Han4, Hilary M Babcock3.   

Abstract

Terminal room cleaning is critical in preventing pathogen transmission; however, the optimal cleaning effectiveness assessment modality is still being investigated. We sequentially compared cleanliness assessment agreement between a fluorescent marker and an adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence method, finding no significant differences between modalities.
Copyright © 2019 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence; Cleaning staff; Environmental services; Housekeeping; Terminal cleaning

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2019        PMID： 31744633      PMCID： PMC7127980          DOI： 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN： 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  10 in total

1.  Caged ATP - an internal calibration method for ATP bioluminescence assays.

Authors:  R M Calvert; H C Hopkins; M J Reilly; S J Forsythe
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.858

2.  Sample size calculation for agreement between two raters with binary endpoints using exact tests.

Authors:  Guogen Shan
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Diagnostic assessment of different environmental cleaning monitoring methods.

Authors:  Laura Luick; Paul A Thompson; Mark H Loock; Sheree L Vetter; Joan Cook; Dubert M Guerrero
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.918

4.  Risk of acquiring antibiotic-resistant bacteria from prior room occupants.

Authors:  Susan S Huang; Rupak Datta; Richard Platt
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-10-09

5.  Comparison of fluorescent marker systems with 2 quantitative methods of assessing terminal cleaning practices.

Authors:  John M Boyce; Nancy L Havill; Heather L Havill; Elise Mangione; Diane G Dumigan; Brent A Moore
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Evaluation of hospital room assignment and acquisition of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Megan K Shaughnessy; Renee L Micielli; Daryl D DePestel; Jennifer Arndt; Cathy L Strachan; Kathy B Welch; Carol E Chenoweth
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Effect of chemical sanitizing agents on ATP bioluminescence measurements.

Authors:  T A Green; S M Russell; D L Fletcher
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.077

Review 8.  Cleaning Hospital Room Surfaces to Prevent Health Care-Associated Infections: A Technical Brief.

Authors:  Jennifer H Han; Nancy Sullivan; Brian F Leas; David A Pegues; Janice L Kaczmarek; Craig A Umscheid
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Comparing the Bioburden Measured by Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) Luminescence Technology to Contact Plate-Based Microbiologic Sampling to Assess the Cleanliness of the Patient Care Environment.

Authors:  Elizabeth Salsgiver; Daniel Bernstein; Matthew S Simon; William Greendyke; Haomiao Jia; Amy Robertson; Selma Salter; Audrey N Schuetz; Lisa Saiman; E Yoko Furuya; David P Calfee
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.254

10.  Effect of chemical cleaning agents and commercial sanitizers on ATP bioluminescence measurements.

Authors:  T A Green; S M Russell; D L Fletcher
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.077
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.