Literature DB >> 28050814

What Orthopaedic Operating Room Surfaces Are Contaminated With Bioburden? A Study Using the ATP Bioluminescence Assay.

Raveesh Daniel Richard1, Thomas R Bowen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contaminated operating room surfaces can increase the risk of orthopaedic infections, particularly after procedures in which hardware implantation and instrumentation are used. The question arises as to how surgeons can measure surface cleanliness to detect increased levels of bioburden. This study aims to highlight the utility of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence technology as a novel technique in detecting the degree of contamination within the sterile operating room environment. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: What orthopaedic operating room surfaces are contaminated with bioburden?
METHODS: When energy is required for cellular work, ATP breaks down into adenosine biphosphate (ADP) and phosphate (P) and in that process releases energy. This process is inherent to all living things and can be detected as light emission with the use of bioluminescence assays. On a given day, six different orthopaedic surgery operating rooms (two adult reconstruction, two trauma, two spine) were tested before surgery with an ATP bioluminescence assay kit. All of the cases were considered clean surgery without infection, and this included the previously performed cases in each sampled room. These rooms had been cleaned and prepped for surgery but the patients had not been physically brought into the room. A total of 13 different surfaces were sampled once in each room: the operating room (OR) preparation table (both pre- and postdraping), OR light handles, Bovie machine buttons, supply closet countertops, the inside of the Bair Hugger™ hose, Bair Hugger™ buttons, right side of the OR table headboard, tourniquet machine buttons, the Clark-socket attachment, and patient positioners used for total hip and spine positioning. The relative light units (RLUs) obtained from each sample were recorded and data were compiled and averaged for analysis. These values were compared with previously published ATP benchmark values of 250 to 500 RLUs to define cleanliness in both the hospital and restaurant industries.
RESULTS: All surfaces had bioburden. The ATP RLUs (mean ± SD) are reported for each surface in ascending order: the OR preparation table (postdraping; 8.3 ± 3.4), inside the sterilized pan (9.2 ± 5.5), the inside of the Bair Hugger™ hose (212.5 ± 155.7), supply closet countertops (281.7 ± 236.7), OR light handles (647.8 ± 903.7), the OR preparation table (predraping; 1054 ± 387.5), the Clark-socket attachment (1135.7 ± 705.3), patient positioners used for total hip and spine positioning (1201.7 ± 1144.9), Bovie machine buttons (1264.5 ± 638.8), Bair Hugger™ buttons (1340.8 ± 1064.1), tourniquet machine buttons (1666.5 ± 2144.9), computer keyboard (1810.8 ± 929.6), and the right side of the OR table headboard (2539 ± 5635.8).
CONCLUSIONS: ATP bioluminescence is a novel method to measure cleanliness within the orthopaedic OR and can help identify environmental trouble spots that can potentially lead to increased infection rates. Future studies correlating ATP bioluminescence findings with microbiology cultures could add to the clinical utility of this technology. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surfaces such as the undersurface of the OR table headboard, Bair Hugger™ buttons, and tourniquet machine buttons should be routinely cleansed as part of an institutional protocol. Although correlation between ATP bioluminescence and clinical infection was not evaluated in this study, it is the subject of future research. Specifically, evaluating microbiology samples taken from these environmental surfaces and correlating them with increased bioburden found with ATP bioluminescence technology can help promote improved surgical cleaning practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28050814      PMCID: PMC5449321          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5221-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  21 in total

1.  Is it really clean? An evaluation of the efficacy of four methods for determining hospital cleanliness.

Authors:  O Sherlock; N O'Connell; E Creamer; H Humphreys
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Do surface and cleaning chemistries interfere with ATP measurement systems for monitoring patient room hygiene?

Authors:  E Brown; A R Eder; K M Thompson
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Cleanliness audit of clinical surfaces and equipment: who cleans what?

Authors:  R E Anderson; V Young; M Stewart; C Robertson; S J Dancer
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 4.  Rapid microbiology: applications of bioluminescence in the food industry--a review.

Authors:  C J Stannard; P A Gibbs
Journal:  J Biolumin Chemilumin       Date:  1986-06

Review 5.  Evaluating hygienic cleaning in health care settings: what you do not know can harm your patients.

Authors:  Philip C Carling; Judene M Bartley
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 6.  The role of the surface environment in healthcare-associated infections.

Authors:  David J Weber; Deverick Anderson; William A Rutala
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.915

7.  Monitoring the effectiveness of hospital cleaning practices by use of an adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay.

Authors:  John M Boyce; Nancy L Havill; Diane G Dumigan; Michael Golebiewski; Ola Balogun; Ramo Rizvani
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  A modified ATP benchmark for evaluating the cleaning of some hospital environmental surfaces.

Authors:  T Lewis; C Griffith; M Gallo; M Weinbren
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Effect of chemical cleaning agents and commercial sanitizers on ATP bioluminescence measurements.

Authors:  T A Green; S M Russell; D L Fletcher
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.077

10.  Contamination, disinfection, and cross-colonization: are hospital surfaces reservoirs for nosocomial infection?

Authors:  Bala Hota
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-09-27       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  5 in total

1.  Surface contamination in the operating room: use of adenosine triphosphate monitoring.

Authors:  Alex Ramirez; Sanjay Mohan; Rebecca Miller; Dmitry Tumin; Joshua C Uffman; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  CORR Insights®: Surgical Loupes Worn by Orthopaedic Surgeons Are a Reservoir for Microorganisms.

Authors:  Charalampos G Zalavras
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  What's on your keyboard? A systematic review of the contamination of peripheral computer devices in healthcare settings.

Authors:  Nicole Ide; Bianca K Frogner; Cynthia M LeRouge; Patrick Vigil; Matthew Thompson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  ATP bioluminescence assay for evaluating cleaning practices in operating theatres: applicability and limitations.

Authors:  Tiziana Sanna; Laura Dallolio; Alessandra Raggi; Magda Mazzetti; Giovanni Lorusso; Angela Zanni; Patrizia Farruggia; Erica Leoni
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Implant contamination as a cause of surgical site infection in spinal surgery: are single-use implants a reasonable solution? - a systematic review.

Authors:  Friederike Schömig; Carsten Perka; Matthias Pumberger; Rudolf Ascherl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.