Literature DB >> 9921723

Dimensions of hearing aid outcome.

L E Humes1.   

Abstract

Dimensions of hearing aid outcome are explored in this paper. First, a variety of hearing aid outcome measures is defined including objective and subjective performance, objective and subjective benefit, satisfaction, and use. Following the definition of these terms, factor analysis is described as a statistical tool that can be of assistance in establishing the number and nature of the relevant dimensions of hearing aid outcome. Next, the results from three recent studies that included a variety of measures of hearing aid outcome are examined and factor analysis is applied to the data from each study. This examination leads to the conclusion that hearing aid outcome is a multidimensional construct, rather than unidimensional. The most complete description of hearing aid outcome will be obtained when including at least one measure of aided speech recognition performance, one or more measures of objective benefit in speech recognition, one or two subjective measures of sound quality or listening effort, and one measure of either subjective benefit, satisfaction, or use.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9921723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  26 in total

1.  Modeling and predicting hearing aid outcome.

Authors:  Larry E Humes
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

2.  Effects of hearing and aging on sentence-level time-gated word recognition.

Authors:  Michelle R Molis; Sean D Kampel; Garnett P McMillan; Frederick J Gallun; Serena M Dann; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Effects of compression on speech acoustics, intelligibility, and sound quality.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-12

4.  A Comparison of Two Methods for Measuring Listening Effort As Part of an Audiologic Test Battery.

Authors:  Jani Johnson; Jingjing Xu; Robyn Cox; Paul Pendergraft
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.493

5.  The Effects of Meaning-Based Auditory Training on Behavioral Measures of Perceptual Effort in Individuals with Impaired Hearing.

Authors:  Mitchell S Sommers; Nancy Tye-Murray; Joe Barcroft; Brent P Spehar
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

6.  Evaluation of the NAL Dynamic Conversations Test in older listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Gitte Keidser; Katrina Freeston; Jörg M Buchholz
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Hearing-aid use and long-term health outcomes: Hearing handicap, mental health, social engagement, cognitive function, physical health, and mortality.

Authors:  Piers Dawes; Karen J Cruickshanks; Mary E Fischer; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; David M Nondahl
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  The Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Listening Effort in Adults With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Julia Gordon; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Speech-perception training for older adults with hearing loss impacts word recognition and effort.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Kenneth I Vaden; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.