Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty.

In many recent publications it was suggested that the amount of early subsidence of a femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty is indicative for later revision. In this article it is argued that stems can be designed according to alternative objectives, resulting in different shapes and surface roughness, each producing its own characteristic postoperative subsidence pattern. It was investigated whether these inherent subsidence patterns can be estimated in preclinical testing. For that purpose two stems, both without a collar, relying on cement fixation only, were compared regarding their stress transfer, migration, and induced micromotion behavior. Finite element analysis, cyclic bench testing of substitute bone reconstructions, and clinical radiostereophotogrammetric analysis were applied. The stems investigated were the Exeter, which is assumed to be a force closed fixation design, relying on subsidence under load as a method of maintaining stability, and the SHP, as a shape closed fixation design, meant to be contained by the cement mantle. Both designs were true to their design concepts in the analyses, in the sense that migrations and micromotions of the Exeter stems far exceeded those of the SHP stems. It was found that preclinical studies such as finite element analysis or bench tests give reasonable indications of in vivo postoperative behavior. It is concluded that early clinical migration values should be considered relative to stem shape and surface finish, when prediction of later revision probability is the issue.