Literature DB >> 16292769

Fatigue debonding of the roughened stem-cement interface: effects of surface roughness and stem heating conditions.

Leatha A Damron1, Do-Gyoon Kim, Kenneth A Mann.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of cyclic loading on the debond process of a roughened stem-cement interface used in total hip arthroplasty. The specific goals were to assess the effects of two surgeon-controlled variables (stem heating and degree of stem surface roughness) and to determine if an independent finite element-based fracture mechanics model could be used to predict the debond response. A clamped cantilever beam geometry was used to determine the fatigue debond response of the stem-cement interface and was created using an experimental mold that simulated in vivo cementing conditions. A second experiment was performed using a torsion-loading model representative of the stem-cement-bone composite. For both experiments, two stem heating (room temperature and 50 degrees C) and surface roughness conditions (grit blasted: Ra = 2.3 and 5.1 microm) were used. Finally, a finite element model of the torsion experiment with provision for crack growth was developed and compared with the experimental results. Results from both experiments revealed that neither stem preheating nor use of a stem with a greater surface roughness had a marked effect on the fatigue debond response. There was substantial variability in the debond response for all cases; this may be due to microscopic gaps at the interface for all interface conditions. The debond rate from the finite element simulation (10(-7.31) m/cycle) had a magnitude similar to the experimental torsion model (10(-(6.77 +/- 1.25)) m/cycle). This suggests that within the context of the experimental conditions studied here that the debond response could be assessed using a linear elastic fracture mechanics-type approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16292769      PMCID: PMC2040043          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  22 in total

1.  A prospective randomized trial of cemented femoral components with polished versus grit-blasted surface finish and identical stem geometry.

Authors:  Thomas Parker Vail; Devon Goetz; Michael Tanzer; David A Fisher; Craig G Mohler; John J Callaghan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Porosity reduction in bone cement at the cement-stem interface.

Authors:  N E Bishop; S Ferguson; S Tepic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-05

3.  Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Huiskes; N Verdonschot; B Nivbrant
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Loosening rates and bone lysis with rough finished and polished stems.

Authors:  D K Collis; C G Mohler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics.

Authors:  R D Crowninshield; J D Jennings; M L Laurent; W J Maloney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Cement debonding process of total hip arthroplasty stems.

Authors:  N Verdonschot; R Huiskes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Accelerated polymerization of acrylic bone cement using preheated implants.

Authors:  D M Dall; A W Miles; G Juby
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Early failure of precoated femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alvin Ong; Kirk L Wong; Max Lai; Jonathan P Garino; Marvin E Steinberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a precoated offset stem. Four to nine-year results.

Authors:  V P Cannestra; R A Berger; L R Quigley; J J Jacobs; A G Rosenberg; J O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of smooth versus rough stems using cement fixation: minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Vijay J Rasquinha; Chitranjan S Ranawat; Vipul Dua; Amar S Ranawat; Jose A Rodriguez
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  2 in total

1.  Random damage and characteristics of debris particles are two important and yet ignored factors in the mechanical integrity of the stem-cement interface of a total hip replacement: influence of the surface finish of the metal stem.

Authors:  Gang Qi; Steven F Wayne; Kenneth A Mann; Bin Zhang; Gladius Lewis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Cement-implant interface contamination: possible reason of inferior clinical outcomes for rough surface cemented stems.

Authors:  Tian Wang; Matthew H Pelletier; Nicky Bertollo; Alan Crosky; William R Walsh
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2013-06-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.