Literature DB >> 991520

In vitro measurement of bone-acrylic interface pressure during femoral component insertion.

K L Markolf, H C Amstutz.   

Abstract

Bone-acrylic interface pressure measurements were recorded at the medial interior rasped surfaces of fresh cadaver femurs during digital packing of acrylic bone cement and during insertion and seating of a Trapezoidal-28 femoral total hip component. Plugging of the femoral canal below the tip of the prosthesis stem was an effective means for increasing pressure in the distal femoral canal when the stem was inserted in the early stages of acrylic polymerization (i.e. immediately after dough time). At surgery, this can be accomplished by inserting a small bolus of acrylic down the canal to a depth below the tip of the seated stem and allowing it to polymerize in place. This forms an effective seal which prevents distal extrusion of the acrylic when the cavity is then packed prior to prosthesis insertion. Elimination of cement in the distal canal also avoids any future difficulty of acrylic removal should revision become necessary due to loosening or infection. No significant pressure differences were observed between one and two millimeter thicknesses of acrylic between the metal and bone. Interface pressures developed during finger packing were of the same order of magnitude as those achieved during seating of the femoral component. Use of a rubber diaphragm stretched tightly over the margins of the rasped femoral cavity helped to contain the acrylic and prevent extrusion during finger packing but was ineffective in increasing interface pressure. When this method is used, the acrylic can be poured or injected into the canal and packed before dough stage and thus facilitate increased cancellous penetration when the acrylic is in a state of low viscosity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 991520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  4 in total

1.  [Effect of femoral cementing technique on results. Comparison between retrograde technique and vacuum application].

Authors:  S Ungethuem; B Lehner; T Reitzel; P J Buckley; H Mau; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [The influence of jet-lavage systems on in vitro cement penetration].

Authors:  C-R Becker; B Lehner; S Ungethüm; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  2008 Otto Aufranc Award: component design and technique affect cement penetration in hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Wadih Y Matar; Philippe Poitras; Kevin Smit; Olivier May
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Timing of femoral prosthesis insertion during cemented arthroplasty: cement curing and static mechanical strength in an in vivo model.

Authors:  Stephen Hunt; Craig Stone; Shane Seal
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.089

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.