Literature DB >> 15959756

[Effect of femoral cementing technique on results. Comparison between retrograde technique and vacuum application].

S Ungethuem1, B Lehner, T Reitzel, P J Buckley, H Mau, S J Breusch.   

Abstract

METHODS: To evaluate the penetration depth of cement into trabecular femoral bone, femora of 14 sheep were subjected to simultaneous bilateral cementing. After femoral neck osteotomy, preparation of the bone cavities and jet lavage, cement was applied simultaneously using the conventional retrograde method for one side and vacuum application for the contralateral limb. Bilateral simultaneous pressurisation was then applied. All femoral specimens were X-rayed, sawed into standardised, horizontal, stereometric, identical slices and microradiographed. Cement penetration was assessed using a morphometric software system.
RESULTS: No significant differences in depth of cement penetration between sheep femora cemented with the vacuum application method and the standard retrograde method could be found or between the ratio of cement-consolidated and non-cement-consolidated cancellous bone.
CONCLUSION: The more complicated and technically challenging method of cement application under vacuum had no advantage in terms of cement interdigitation over the standard retrograde method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15959756     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-005-0770-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  22 in total

1.  [Significance of jet lavage for in vitro and in vivo cement penetration].

Authors:  S J Breusch; U Schneider; T Reitzel; J Kreutzer; V Ewerbeck; M Lukoschek
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

2.  Long-term comparison of Charnley and Stanmore design total hip replacements.

Authors:  A R Britton; D W Murray; C J Bulstrode; K McPherson; R A Denham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-09

3.  In vitro measurement of bone-acrylic interface pressure during femoral component insertion.

Authors:  K L Markolf; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Effects of laminations and blood entrapment on the strength of acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  T A Gruen; K L Markolf; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review.

Authors:  R L Barrack; R D Mulroy; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-05

Review 6.  Modern cementing techniques. An experimental study of vacuum insertion of bone cement.

Authors:  K Draenert
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 0.500

7.  The influence of cementing technique and blood on the strength of the bone-cement interface.

Authors:  G C Bannister; A W Miles
Journal:  Eng Med       Date:  1988-07

8.  Cementing technique and the effects of bleeding.

Authors:  J B Benjamin; G A Gie; A J Lee; R S Ling; R G Volz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-08

9.  Strength of the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  W R Krause; W Krug; J Miller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The John Charnley Award. Prophylaxis of fat and bone marrow embolism in cemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R P Pitto; M Koessler; K Draenert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  1 in total

1.  Tibial cleaning method for cemented total knee arthroplasty: An experimental study.

Authors:  Peter Helwig; Lukas Konstantinidis; Anja Hirschmüller; Verena Miltenberger; Kerstin Kuminack; Norbert P Südkamp; Oliver Hauschild
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.251

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.