Literature DB >> 9894653

Assessment of the subclavian vein in patients with transvenous pacemaker leads.

M Zuber1, P Huber, U Fricker, P Buser, K Jäger.   

Abstract

Thrombosis of the subclavian vein can occur after the implantation of transvenous pacemaker electrodes. Although this is seldom followed by thromboembolic complications, it can cause problems when replacing the leads. To assess the impact of the pacemaker leads on the subclavian vein, a study using noninvasive duplex sonography was performed on 56 patients at an average of 41 months after the implantation. Forty-three percent of the patients were found to have a normal function of the subclavian vein, 46% developed pathological changes of the vessel wall, and 11% occluded. These changes rarely caused symptoms, and, therefore, had little clinical significance. Moreover, the occlusion rate was found independent of the patient's age, the patient's sex, the number of electrodes, the procedure of implantation, and even the time from implantation. As a result, the clinical diagnosis of occlusion is uncertain. Therefore, duplex sonography is recommended as an easy means of excluding a totally thrombosed subclavian vein prior to replacing pacemaker leads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9894653     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00039.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  10 in total

Review 1.  Pacemaker lead complications: when is extraction appropriate and what can we learn from published data?

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; L M van Gelder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  [Strategies to avoid complications and to solve technical problems during the implantation of CRT and CRT-D systems].

Authors:  M Stockburger
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2006

3.  [Optimal electrode placement. What to consider during implantation of a biventricular pacemaker?].

Authors:  C Butter; H-H Minden
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2009-09

Review 4.  Endovascular extraction techniques for pacemaker and ICD lead extraction: Part 1.

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; B van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 5.  Endovascular extraction techniques: Part 2: Complications and indications.

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; B van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 6.  Venous thrombosis and stenosis after implantation of pacemakers and defibrillators.

Authors:  Grzegorz Rozmus; James P Daubert; David T Huang; Spencer Rosero; Burr Hall; Charles Francis
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Deployment of left ventricular lead from the ipsilateral side of central vein obstruction.

Authors:  Klaus K A Witte; Sue J Kelly; John D Parker; Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 8.  Pacing device therapy in infants and children: a review.

Authors:  Daiji Takeuchi; Yasuko Tomizawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 1.731

9.  Predictors of venous stenosis or occlusion following first transvenous cardiac device implantation: Prospective observational study.

Authors:  Andrzej Cacko; Eliza Kozyra-Pydyś; Monika Gawałko; Grzegorz Opolski; Marcin Grabowski
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 2.283

10.  Severity and Extent of Lead-Related Venous Obstruction in More Than 3000 Patients Undergoing Transvenous Lead Extraction.

Authors:  Marek Czajkowski; Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Jarosław Kosior; Dorota Nowosielecka; Łukasz Tułecki; Paweł Stefańczyk; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2022-08-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.