Literature DB >> 23104398

Pacing device therapy in infants and children: a review.

Daiji Takeuchi1, Yasuko Tomizawa.   

Abstract

The number of pediatric pacemakers implanted is still relatively small. Children requiring pacing therapy have characteristics that are distinct from those of adults, including physical size, somatic growth, and cardiac anomalies. Considering these features, long-term follow-up of pediatric pacemaker implantation is necessary. Selection of appropriate generators, pacing modes, pacing sites, and leads is important. Generally, epicardial leads are commonly used in small infants. On the other hand, the use of endocardial leads in children is increasing worldwide because of their benefits over epicardial leads, such as minimal invasiveness, lower pacing threshold, and longer generator longevity. Endocardial leads are not suitable for patients with intracardiac shunts because of the high risk of systemic thrombosis. Venous occlusion is another significant problem with endocardial leads. With the increase in the number of pacing device implantations, the incidence of infection from such devices is also increasing. Complete device removal is sometimes recommended to treat device infection, but experience in the removal of endocardial leads in children is still scarce. This article gives an overview of pacing therapy in the pediatric population, including discussions on new pacing systems, such as remote monitoring systems, magnetic imaging compliant pacemaker systems, and leadless pacing devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23104398     DOI: 10.1007/s10047-012-0668-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Artif Organs        ISSN: 1434-7229            Impact factor:   1.731


  118 in total

1.  Complications related to permanent pacemaker therapy.

Authors:  M S Kiviniemi; M A Pirnes; H J Eränen; R V Kettunen; J E Hartikainen
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Paradoxic embolism due to altered hemodynamic sequencing following transvenous pacing.

Authors:  M J Silka; M J Rice
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 3.  Current clinical issues for MRI scanning of pacemaker and defibrillator patients.

Authors:  Ron Kalin; Marshall S Stanton
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 4.  Venous complications after insertion of a transvenous pacemaker.

Authors:  P C Spittell; D L Hayes
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Chronic performance of steroid-eluting epicardial leads in a growing pediatric population: a 10-year comparison.

Authors:  M Silvana Horenstein; Mehdi Hakimi; Henry Walters; Peter P Karpawich
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Multiple systemic emboli complicating the course of a patient with an atrial septal defect, an atrial septal aneurysm and an endocardial right atrial pacemaker lead.

Authors:  C Johnson; L Galindez
Journal:  P R Health Sci J       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 0.705

7.  Pediatric pacemaker infections: twenty years of experience.

Authors:  Mitchell I Cohen; David M Bush; J William Gaynor; Victoria L Vetter; Ronn E Tanel; Larry A Rhodes
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Alternative delivery of a 4Fr lumenless pacing lead in children.

Authors:  Martin J Lapage; Edward K Rhee
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Update on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections and their management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Larry M Baddour; Andrew E Epstein; Christopher C Erickson; Bradley P Knight; Matthew E Levison; Peter B Lockhart; Frederick A Masoudi; Eric J Okum; Walter R Wilson; Lee B Beerman; Ann F Bolger; N A Mark Estes; Michael Gewitz; Jane W Newburger; Eleanor B Schron; Kathryn A Taubert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Endocardial pacemaker implantation in infants weighing < or = 10 kilograms.

Authors:  Janneke A E Kammeraad; Eric Rosenthal; Julian Bostock; Jon Rogers; Narayanswami Sreeram
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.976

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac strangulation from epicardial pacemaker leads: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.

Authors:  Daiji Takeuchi; Yasuko Tomizawa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-10-11

2.  A Case of Transvenous Pacemaker Implantation in a 10-year-old Patient.

Authors:  Jiajia Liu; Yasuyuki Shimada
Journal:  J Rural Med       Date:  2013-12-18

Review 3.  Congenital and childhood atrioventricular blocks: pathophysiology and contemporary management.

Authors:  Alban-Elouen Baruteau; Robert H Pass; Jean-Benoit Thambo; Albin Behaghel; Solène Le Pennec; Elodie Perdreau; Nicolas Combes; Leonardo Liberman; Christopher J McLeod
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Minimally Invasive Epicardial Pacemaker Implantation in Neonates with Congenital Heart Block.

Authors:  Roberto Costa; Katia Regina da Silva; Martino Martinelli Filho; Roger Carrillo
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Original Article--Outcomes of Pacing in Egyptian Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Ahmed Nabil Ali; Samir S Wafa; Hosni Hosni Arafa; Rania Samir
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-04-15

6.  Clinical analysis of temporary pacemaker implantation in 13 children.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Li; Ji Cheng
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2022-02

7.  Micra leadless pacemaker retrieval in a pediatric patient.

Authors:  Erick Jimenez; Varun Aggarwal; John Bass; Daniel Cortez
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2020-03-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.