Literature DB >> 9893815

Spatial-frequency and contrast tuning of the transient-stereopsis system.

C M Schor1, M Edwards, D R Pope.   

Abstract

The tuning of the transient-stereopsis system to luminance contrast and spatial-frequency (SF) was investigated with narrow-band gabor targets with a constant sigma of 1 degree. They were presented for brief (140 ms) durations and subtended a large (6 degrees) disparity. When dichoptic gabor stimuli were matched in SF (0-5 cpd), transient stereo performance was either uniform across SF or greater at frequencies below 1 cpd. When dichoptic stimuli had unmatched SF (0.5 + 0-5 cpd) and matched contrast (100%), stereo performance was impaired below that of the matched SF condition. Stereo performance with matched SF at 0.5 cpd was impaired when contrast of one eye's image was reduced, demonstrating a contrast-paradox effect (i.e. contrast tuning) for transient stereopsis. Performance with three dichoptic unmatched SF conditions (0.5 and 1.0 cpd; 0.5 and 5.0 cpd; 1.5 and 3.5 cpd) was improved when the contrasts of the low SF gabor was reduced while holding the contrast of the high SF gabor constant at 100%. However stereo performance was not improved by reducing the contrast of a high SF gabor (3.5 cpd) while holding the contrast of the lower SF gabor (1.5 cpd) constant at 100%. We interpret these findings as indicating that transient-stereopsis performance is mediated by a single spatial-channel that has low-pass spatial-frequency sensitivity and which compares the ocular based signals prior to binocular combination so that signals that are not balanced in terms of their strength lead to a weaker binocular signal, as per the model proposed by Kontsevich and Tyler (Vis Res 1994; 3417:2317-2329) for sustained stereopsis.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9893815     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00467-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  Size-disparity correlation in human binocular depth perception.

Authors:  S J Prince; R A Eagle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Contrast gain control in the visual cortex: monocular versus binocular mechanisms.

Authors:  A M Truchard; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The wallpaper illusion explained.

Authors:  Suzanne P McKee; Preeti Verghese; Anna Ma-Wyatt; Yury Petrov
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  How to use individual differences to isolate functional organization, biology, and utility of visual functions; with illustrative proposals for stereopsis.

Authors:  Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2008

5.  Orientation-specific computation in stereoscopic vision.

Authors:  Bart Farell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Relationship between threshold and suprathreshold perception of position and stereoscopic depth.

Authors:  Saumil S Patel; Harold E Bedell; Dorcas K Tsang; Michael T Ukwade
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Dynamics of absolute and relative disparity processing in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Milena Kaestner; Marissa L Evans; Yulan D Chen; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 7.400

Review 8.  Binocular fusion, suppression and diplopia for blurred edges.

Authors:  Mark A Georgeson; Stuart A Wallis
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Encoding and estimation of first- and second-order binocular disparity in natural images.

Authors:  Paul B Hibbard; Ross Goutcher; David W Hunter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Temporal dynamics of mirror-symmetry perception.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sharman; Sebastian Gregersen; Elena Gheorghiu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.