Literature DB >> 19340259

Relationship between threshold and suprathreshold perception of position and stereoscopic depth.

Saumil S Patel1, Harold E Bedell, Dorcas K Tsang, Michael T Ukwade.   

Abstract

We seek to determine the relationship between threshold and suprathreshold perception for position offset and stereoscopic depth perception under conditions that elevate their respective thresholds. Two threshold-elevating conditions were used: (1) increasing the interline gap and (2) dioptric blur. Although increasing the interline gap increases position (Vernier) offset and stereoscopic disparity thresholds substantially, the perception of suprathreshold position offset and stereoscopic depth remains unchanged. Perception of suprathreshold position offset also remains unchanged when the Vernier threshold is elevated by dioptric blur. We show that such normalization of suprathreshold position offset can be attributed to the topographical-map-based encoding of position. On the other hand, dioptric blur increases the stereoscopic disparity thresholds and reduces the perceived suprathreshold stereoscopic depth, which can be accounted for by a disparity-computation model in which the activities of absolute disparity encoders are multiplied by a Gaussian weighting function that is centered on the horopter. Overall, the statement "equal suprathreshold perception occurs in threshold-elevated and unelevated conditions when the stimuli are equally above their corresponding thresholds" describes the results better than the statement "suprathreshold stimuli are perceived as equal when they are equal multiples of their respective threshold values."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19340259      PMCID: PMC2829985          DOI: 10.1364/josaa.26.000847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  42 in total

1.  Vernier judgments in the absence of regular shape information.

Authors:  S S Patel; H E Bedell; M T Ukwade
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Perceived distance, shape and size.

Authors:  E Brenner; W J van Damme
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  THE RECEPTORS OF HUMAN COLOR VISION.

Authors:  G WALD
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Pooling signals from vertically and non-vertically orientation-tuned disparity mechanisms in human stereopsis.

Authors:  Saumil S Patel; Harold E Bedell; Preetha Sampat
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Vernier and letter acuities for low-pass filtered moving stimuli.

Authors:  S T Chung; H E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Spatial scale interactions in stereo sensitivity and the neural representation of binocular disparity.

Authors:  H S Smallman; D I MacLeod
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Neural encoding of binocular disparity: energy models, position shifts and phase shifts.

Authors:  D J Fleet; H Wagner; D J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues.

Authors:  M F Bradshaw; A Glennerster; B J Rogers
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Physiological computation of binocular disparity.

Authors:  N Qian; Y Zhu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The distance used for scaling disparities is the same as the one used for scaling retinal size.

Authors:  W van Damme; E Brenner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  3 in total

1.  Perceived suprathreshold depth under conditions that elevate the stereothreshold.

Authors:  Harold E Bedell; Liat Gantz; Danielle N Jackson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  The absolute disparity anomaly and the mechanism of relative disparities.

Authors:  Adrien Chopin; Dennis Levi; David Knill; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Selecting the Most Relevant Brain Regions to Classify Children with Developmental Dyslexia and Typical Readers by Using Complex Magnocellular Stimuli and Multiple Kernel Learning.

Authors:  Sara Mascheretti; Denis Peruzzo; Chiara Andreola; Martina Villa; Tommaso Ciceri; Vittoria Trezzi; Cecilia Marino; Filippo Arrigoni
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.