Literature DB >> 10445290

Size-disparity correlation in human binocular depth perception.

S J Prince1, R A Eagle.   

Abstract

To use the small horizontal disparities between images projected to the eyes for the recovery of three-dimensional information, our visual system must first identify which feature in one eye's image corresponds with which in the other. The earliest level of disparity processing in primates (V1) contains cells that are spatial-frequency tuned. If such cells have a disparity range that covers only a single period of their mean tuning frequency, there will always be exactly one potential match within this range. Here, this 'size-disparity' hypothesis was tested by measuring the contrast sensitivity of stereopsis as a function of disparity for single bandpass-filtered items. It was found that thresholds were low and relatively constant up to disparities an order of magnitude larger than is predicted by this constraint. Furthermore, peak sensitivity was relatively independent of spatial frequency. A control experiment showed that binocular correlation of the carrier is necessary for this task. In a third experiment, the maximum disparity that supports threshold performance was compared for an isolated bandpass item and bandpass-filtered noise. This limit was found to be five times larger for the isolated stimuli. In summary, these findings show that the initial stage of disparity detection is not limited by the size-disparity constraint. For stimuli with multiple false targets, however, processes subsequent to this stage reduce the disparity range over which the correspondence problem can be solved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10445290      PMCID: PMC1690069          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  14 in total

1.  Contrast masking reveals spatial-frequency channels in stereopsis.

Authors:  S J Prince; R A Eagle; B J Rogers
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Spatial frequency tuning of human stereopsis.

Authors:  Y Yang; R Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Encoding of binocular disparity by simple cells in the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  I Ohzawa; G C DeAngelis; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neural encoding of binocular disparity: energy models, position shifts and phase shifts.

Authors:  D J Fleet; H Wagner; D J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Is the site of non-linear filtering in stereopsis before or after binocular combination?

Authors:  L M Wilcox; R F Hess
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  A computational theory of human stereo vision.

Authors:  D Marr; T Poggio
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-05-23

7.  Convergent disparity discriminations in narrow-band-filtered random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  J E Mayhew; J P Frisby
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold.

Authors:  H S Smallman; D I MacLeod
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency.

Authors:  C M Schor; I Wood
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Linear and non-linear filtering in stereopsis.

Authors:  R F Hess; L M Wilcox
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  5 in total

1.  Sensors for impossible stimuli may solve the stereo correspondence problem.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Monocular blur alters the tuning characteristics of stereopsis for spatial frequency and size.

Authors:  Roger W Li; Kayee So; Thomas H Wu; Ashley P Craven; Truyet T Tran; Kevin M Gustafson; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 3.  Binocular fusion, suppression and diplopia for blurred edges.

Authors:  Mark A Georgeson; Stuart A Wallis
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  A Single Mechanism Can Account for Human Perception of Depth in Mixed Correlation Random Dot Stereograms.

Authors:  Sid Henriksen; Bruce G Cumming; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 5.  Neural architectures for stereo vision.

Authors:  Andrew J Parker; Jackson E T Smith; Kristine Krug
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.