Literature DB >> 14600776

Potential clinical relevance of digital radiogrammetry for quantification of periarticular bone demineralization in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis depending on severity and compared with DXA.

J Böttcher1, A Malich, A Pfeil, A Petrovitch, G Lehmann, J P Heyne, G Hein, W A Kaiser.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate a new bone densitometric technology based on digital radiogrammetry (DXR) with respect to its ability to measure severity-dependent variations of bone mineralization in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. One hundred six randomly selected patients suffering from verified rheumatoid arthritis underwent digitally performed plain radiographs of the non-dominant hand and measurements of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) regarding total femur and lumbar spine. Using DXR the radiographs were analyzed retrospectively for bone mineral density (BMD) calculation. The severity was classified using Larsen score and Steinbroker stage blinded by two radiologists. A third radiologist reviewed the incongruently scored cases. Mean values of calculated parameters changed as follows from Larsen 1 to Larsen 5: Bone mineral density (DXR-BMD) decreased from 0.55 to 0.44 g/cm2 (p=0.000), DXR-MCI decreased from 0.44 to 0.33 (p=0.001), DXA-BMD (total femur) decreased from 0.92 to 0.78 g/cm2 (p=0.090) and DXA-BMD (lumbar spine) decreased from 0.91 to 0.84 g/cm2 (p=0.595). Similar results were verified for the Steinbroker stage. The relative decrease of BMD measured by DXR between the highest and lowest score was 20% for Steinbroker stage and Larsen score (p<0.05). The relative decrease of BMD using DXA revealed not such a significant result. Similar results were verified for metacarpal index (estimated by DXR). Correlations between BMD determined by DXR and by DXA were all significant (R=0.45 for lumbar spine and R=0.59 for total femur). Consequently, less than 35% of the DXR-BMD value is explainable by corresponding DXA values. The DXR-based BMD calculation seems to be able to distinguish severity and progress of the disease in contrast to those of DXA at lumbar spine and total femur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14600776     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-2087-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  26 in total

1.  [Influence of osteoarthrosis, osteoporosis, and rheumatoid arthritis at precision of osteodensitometry of lumbar spine and proximal femur].

Authors:  F Martini; S Tröndle; S Sell; F Mayer; R Willms; M Teschner
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Thickness of the cortical layer as an estimate of mineral content of human finger bones.

Authors:  P VIRTAMA; H MAHONEN
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach.

Authors:  E BARNETT; B E NORDIN
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Correlation of radial SPA and pQCT with the femoral DEXA measurement in elderly women.

Authors:  C R Russo
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Age-related cortical bone loss at the metacarpal.

Authors:  D Maggio; R Pacifici; A Cherubini; G Simonelli; M Luchetti; M C Aisa; D Cucinotta; S Adami; U Senin
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis: guidelines for the utilization of bone densitometry.

Authors:  D T Baran; K G Faulkner; H K Genant; P D Miller; R Pacifici
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Cortical thickness measurements and photon absorptiometry for determination of bone quantity.

Authors:  E C Cameron; R M Boyd; D Luk; H W McIntosh; V R Walker
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1977-01-22       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Measurement of forearm bone mineral density: comparison of precision of five different instruments.

Authors:  P Heilmann; C Wüster; C Prolingheuer; M Götz; R Ziegler
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Hand radiography of 200 patients with rheumatoid arthritis repeated after an interval of one year.

Authors:  A Larsen; J Thoen
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Advantages of peripheral radiogrametry over dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine in the assessment of prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  H E Meema; H Meindok
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  27 in total

1.  Computerized digital imaging techniques provided by digital X-ray radiogrammetry as new diagnostic tool in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Joachim Böttcher; Alexander Pfeil; Anders Rosholm; Max-Ludwig Schäfer; Ansgar Malich; Alexander Petrovitch; Bettina Seidl; Gabriele Lehmann; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Gert Hein; Gunter Wolf; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  CAD for mammography: the technique, results, current role and further developments.

Authors:  Ansgar Malich; Dorothee R Fischer; Joachim Böttcher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Multi-site quantitative ultrasound compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in rheumatoid arthritis: effects of body mass index and inflamed soft tissue on reproducibility.

Authors:  A Pfeil; J Böttcher; H J Mentzel; G Lehmann; M L Schäfer; A Kramer; A Petrovitch; B E Seidl; A Malich; G Hein; G Wolf; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Influence of angulation on metacarpal bone mineral density measurements using digital X-ray radiogrammetry.

Authors:  Alexander Pfeil; Diane M Renz; Rosemarie Fröber; Andreas Hansch; Gabriele Lehmann; Julia Sommerfeld; Ansgar Malich; Gunter Wolf; Joachim Böttcher
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 5.  Hand bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Gamze Kilic; Salih Ozgocmen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-18

6.  Age-related changes in cortical bone mass: data from a German female cohort.

Authors:  V A Molina Toledo; M Jergas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-10-08       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Accelerated hand bone mineral density loss is associated with progressive joint damage in hands and feet in recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Melek Güler-Yüksel; Naomi B Klarenbeek; Yvonne P M Goekoop-Ruiterman; Jeska K de Vries-Bouwstra; Sjoerd M van der Kooij; Andreas H Gerards; H Karel Ronday; Tom W J Huizinga; Ben A C Dijkmans; Cornelia F Allaart; Willem F Lems
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 5.156

8.  Disease activity and severity in early inflammatory arthritis predict hand cortical bone loss.

Authors:  Stephen R Pye; Judith E Adams; Kate A Ward; Diane K Bunn; Deborah P M Symmons; Terence W O'Neill
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 7.580

9.  Digital X-ray radiogrammetry and its sensitivity and specificity for the identification of rheumatoid arthritis-related cortical hand bone loss.

Authors:  Alexander Pfeil; Glenn Haugeberg; Diane M Renz; Lisa Reinhardt; Christian Jung; Marcus Franz; Gunter Wolf; Joachim Böttcher
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Effects of leflunomide and methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis detected by digital X-ray radiogrammetry and computer-aided joint space analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Pfeil; Julia Lippold; Thorsten Eidner; Gabriele Lehmann; Peter Oelzner; Diane M Renz; Andreas Hansch; Gunter Wolf; Gert Hein; Werner A Kaiser; Joachim Böttcher
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 2.631

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.