Literature DB >> 9889806

A novel colon pouch and its comparison with a straight coloanal and colon J-pouch--anal anastomosis: preliminary results in pigs.

K Z'graggen1, C A Maurer, D Mettler, C Stoupis, S Wildi, M W Büchler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early functional results after complete rectal resection and straight coloanal anastomosis are often characterized by frequent bowel movements, urgency, and varying degrees of stool incontinence. The formation of a colon reservoir improves early and long-term function. We evaluated the feasibility of a novel, modified design of a colon pouch--anal anastomosis in pigs and compared the results with those of pigs with straight coloanal anastomosis and colon J-pouch.
METHODS: Complete rectal resection followed by either a straight coloanal anastomosis, a colon J-pouch, or a novel design of a colon pouch was performed in equal numbers in 15 pigs. By transversely closing a longitudinal colotomy, the new, technically simpler pouch is formed. Functional results were assessed during a period of 6 weeks.
RESULTS: All 15 procedures were successful. The novel colon pouch required less surgical time than the colon J-pouch, and the formation of the pouches did not reduce tissue perfusion as assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry. The mean volume of the novel colon pouch was significantly smaller than the volume of the colon J-pouch. All the pigs with the novel colon pouch had normal stool frequency and consistency during a period of 6 weeks. In the group with straight coloanal anastomosis, two pigs had increased frequency of defecation, one pig showed signs of urgency and perianal dermatitis, and three had substantially reduced stool consistency. Of the four pigs with colon J-pouch, three had signs of impaired pouch evacuation and two had reduced stool frequency.
CONCLUSIONS: The novel colon pouch is feasible in pigs and technically simpler than the colon J-pouch. These preliminary results indicate that the smaller capacity of this pouch seems sufficient for normal defecation. Its short-term functional results were better than those after reconstruction with a colon J-pouch or a straight coloanal anastomosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9889806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates.

Authors:  Yik-Hong Ho; Steven Brown; Siu-Meng Heah; Charles Tsang; Francis Seow-Choen; Kong-Weng Eu; Choong Leong Tang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Ileocecal reservoir reconstruction after total mesorectal excision: functional results of the long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C T Hamel; J Metzger; G Curti; L Degen; F Harder; M O von Flüe
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Techniques for restoring bowel continuity and function after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Yik-Hong Ho
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Taeniectomy pouch as neorectum after low rectal resection.

Authors:  A Farag; A N Mashhour; M Y Elbarmelgi; M M Raslan; A M Abdelsalam; A A Mohsen
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Taeniectomy Versus Transverse Coloplasty as Neorectum After Low Rectal Resection.

Authors:  Ahmed Farag; Abdrabou N Mashhour; Mohamed Yehia Elbarmelgi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Current Management and Future Directions.

Authors:  Timothy J Ridolfi; Nicholas Berger; Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

7.  A randomized multicenter trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life, and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers.

Authors:  Victor W Fazio; Massarat Zutshi; Feza H Remzi; Yann Parc; Reinhard Ruppert; Alois Fürst; James Celebrezze; Susan Galanduik; Guy Orangio; Neil Hyman; Leslie Bokey; Emmanuel Tiret; Boris Kirchdorfer; David Medich; Marcus Tietze; Tracy Hull; Jeff Hammel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  [The transverse coloplasty pouch after low anterior resection: early postoperative results].

Authors:  A Ulrich; K Z'graggen; B Schmied; J Weitz; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Reconstruction techniques after proctectomy: what's the best?

Authors:  Sebastian G de la Fuente; Christopher R Mantyh
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

10.  Comparison of a colonic J-pouch and transverse coloplasty pouch in patients with rectal cancer after an ultralow anterior resection using fecoflowmetric profiles.

Authors:  Yasuo Kobayashi; Kobayashi Yasuo; Minoru Yagi; Yagi Minoru; Tsuneo Iiai; Iiai Tsuneo; Tatsuo Tani; Tani Tatsuo; Satoshi Maruyama; Maruyama Satoshi; Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama; Hatakeyama Katsuyoshi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.