Literature DB >> 28682131

Taeniectomy pouch as neorectum after low rectal resection.

A Farag1, A N Mashhour1, M Y Elbarmelgi1, M M Raslan1, A M Abdelsalam1, A A Mohsen1.   

Abstract

Background and purpose The functional outcomes of incontinence and high stool frequency resulting from restorative surgery are often criticised. The aim of this study was to assess the taeniectomy pouch in comparison with other pouches described in the literature. Material and methods This was a prospective cohort study. All patients who were candidate for low rectal resection presenting to the colorectal unit at Cairo University hospitals during the period February 2013 to February 2015 were included in the study (90 patients). Safety and feasibility of the new technique were assessed, including operative time, leakage, postoperative urgency, incontinence, number of daily motions and difficulty in evacuation. These parameters were assessed clinically, by means of defecography and anorectal manometry. Results The mean age of patients was 49.6 years. Percentages of postoperative mortality and leakage were 2.2% and 3.4%, respectively. Mean operative time was 117 minutes. Mean numbers of daily motions were 3.04 and 1.52 at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Mean Wexner score for continence at 3 and 12 months were 3.21 and 1.32, respectively. Mean resting pressure was 51.63 mmHg, squeeze pressure was 130.42 mmHg and mean threshold volume was 118.68 ml. Conclusions Taeniectomy is a novel technique for pouch formation after low rectal resection, which can be used as an alternative to other pouches, especially the widely used transverse coloplasty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional outcomes; Low rectal resection; Pouch; Taeniectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28682131      PMCID: PMC5697038          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates.

Authors:  Yik-Hong Ho; Steven Brown; Siu-Meng Heah; Charles Tsang; Francis Seow-Choen; Kong-Weng Eu; Choong Leong Tang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  A survey of postoperative function after rectal anastomosis with circular stapling devices.

Authors:  P J McDonald; R J Heald
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  A G Parks; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-07-08

4.  A randomized multicenter trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life, and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers.

Authors:  Victor W Fazio; Massarat Zutshi; Feza H Remzi; Yann Parc; Reinhard Ruppert; Alois Fürst; James Celebrezze; Susan Galanduik; Guy Orangio; Neil Hyman; Leslie Bokey; Emmanuel Tiret; Boris Kirchdorfer; David Medich; Marcus Tietze; Tracy Hull; Jeff Hammel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis after rectal excision for carcinoma: functional outcome.

Authors:  N J Mortensen; J M Ramirez; N Takeuchi; M M Humphreys
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  A novel colon pouch and its comparison with a straight coloanal and colon J-pouch--anal anastomosis: preliminary results in pigs.

Authors:  K Z'graggen; C A Maurer; D Mettler; C Stoupis; S Wildi; M W Büchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  F Lazorthes; P Fages; P Chiotasso; J Lemozy; E Bloom
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Transverse coloplasty pouch and colonic J-pouch for rectal cancer--a comparative study.

Authors:  J M Pimentel; A Duarte; C Gregório; P Souto; J Patrício
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Why do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma?

Authors:  W G Lewis; I G Martin; M E Williamson; B M Stephenson; P J Holdsworth; P J Finan; D Johnston
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Transverse coloplasty pouch after total mesorectal excision: functional assessment of evacuation.

Authors:  Jörg S Köninger; Michael Butters; Jens D Redecke; Kaspar Z'graggen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  1 in total

1.  Taeniectomy Versus Transverse Coloplasty as Neorectum After Low Rectal Resection.

Authors:  Ahmed Farag; Abdrabou N Mashhour; Mohamed Yehia Elbarmelgi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.